

- Title
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY AMENDMENT (VALUE FOR MONEY IN GOVERNMENT SPENDING) BILL 2010
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
24-06-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
- Page
4345
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Barnett, Sen Guy
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-06-24/0226
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY DISCLOSURE BILL 2010
- BANKRUPTCY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2009
- TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (INFRASTRUCTURE ACCESS) BILL 2009
- BROADCASTING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (DIGITAL TELEVISION) BILL 2010
-
EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT (AVIATION FUEL) BILL 2010
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT (AVIATION FUEL) BILL 2010 - TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2010 MEASURES NO. 3) BILL 2010
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2010 GST ADMINISTRATION MEASURES NO. 3) BILL 2010
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (FOREIGN SOURCE INCOME DEFERRAL) BILL (NO. 1) 2010
- INTERNATIONAL MONETARY AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2010
- NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (CONTINENCE AIDS PAYMENT SCHEME) BILL 2010
- CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (CORPORATE REPORTING REFORM) BILL 2010
- FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PRUDENTIAL REFINEMENTS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
- TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW) BILL (NO. 2) 2010
- CRIMES AMENDMENT (ROYAL FLYING DOCTOR SERVICE) BILL 2010
- HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT (INDEXATION) BILL 2010
- SUPERANNUATION INDUSTRY (SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICALS CODE AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- IMMIGRATION (EDUCATION) AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
- ELECTORAL AND REFERENDUM AMENDMENT (HOW-TO-VOTE CARDS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
- SOCIAL SECURITY AND INDIGENOUS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
- VETERANS’ AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (2010 BUDGET MEASURES) BILL 2010
- VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS AMENDMENT (INCOME SUPPORT MEASURES) BILL 2010
-
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2010-2011
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2010-2011
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2010-2011 - FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CHILD CARE BUDGET MEASURES) BILL 2010
- DEFENCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SECURITY OF DEFENCE PREMISES) BILL 2010
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- CHOICE OF REPAIRER BILL 2010
- PARLIAMENTARY BUDGET OFFICE BILL 2010
- FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY AMENDMENT (VALUE FOR MONEY IN GOVERNMENT SPENDING) BILL 2010
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Budget
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Broadband
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Asylum Seekers
(Brandis, Sen George, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Asylum Seekers
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Building the Education Revolution Program
(Mason, Sen Brett, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Taxation
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Sherry, Sen Nick)
-
Budget
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- COMMITTEES
- SRI LANKA
- CHINA AND TAIWAN
- COMMITTEES
- GREEN LOANS PROGRAM
- NATIONAL CONTAINER DEPOSIT SCHEME
- COMMITTEES
- MINIMUM PRICE F0R ALCOHOL
- PRINCIPLE OF INFORMED CONSENT
- ADOPTION OF A ‘ROBIN HOOD’ TAX
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- BUSINESS
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- INSURANCE CONTRACTS AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- AVIATION TRANSPORT SECURITY AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2010 (NO. 1)
- COMMITTEES
- AVIATION TRANSPORT SECURITY AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2010 (NO. 1)
- COMMITTEES
- BANKRUPTCY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT LEGISLATION
- COMMITTEES
- GOVERNMENT SERVICE DELIVERY
- BUSINESS
- ELECTORAL AND REFERENDUM AMENDMENT (MODERNISATION AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
-
HEALTHCARE IDENTIFIERS BILL 2010
HEALTHCARE IDENTIFIERS (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2010 - BUSINESS
- FARM HOUSEHOLD SUPPORT AMENDMENT (ANCILLARY BENEFITS) BILL 2010
-
BANKRUPTCY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2009
ELECTORAL AND REFERENDUM AMENDMENT (HOW-TO-VOTE CARDS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) AMENDMENT BILL 2010
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW) BILL (NO. 2) 2010
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (INFRASTRUCTURE ACCESS) BILL 2009 - COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- WASTE MANAGEMENT STUDY
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 4345
Senator BARNETT (1:57 PM)
—I move:
That this bill be now read a second time.
I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in Hansard.
Leave granted.
The speech read as follows—
I rise today to introduce into the parliament a Bill for an Act to amend the Financial Management and Accountability Act (1997) to ensure value for money in the use of Commonwealth resources, and for related purposes.
Australians have had enough of the Labor Government’s wasteful and reckless spending. Labor’s pink batts insulation fiasco and Building the Education Revolution (BER) programmes alone have already wasted billions of taxpayers’ dollars, to the shock and dismay of many hard working Australians. This Government has consistently failed to deliver on its promises, has consistently failed on program delivery, and has consistently failed to deliver value for money in the spending of taxpayers’ funds.
Value for money is a highly subjective term which is useful to bring flexibility in normal circumstances. However, this flexibility as administered by Labor is leading to waste, debt and higher taxes, upward pressure on interest rates and increased cost of living for all Australians. Under Labor, the current procurement regime does not offer sufficient protection for taxpayers money, though I note it worked well under the previous Coalition Government.
The responsible stewardship of public money is a duty central to good government and is at the heart of Liberal philosophy. Inherent to this principle is a parallel commitment to avoid the waste of public money.
When last in office, the Coalition implemented far reaching reforms to public spending and procurement, notably introducing the Financial Management and Accountability Act and the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. The rigor these changes brought and the principle of ‘value for money’ allowed wasteful spending to be contained, and was a key to the Coalition paying back Labor’s $96 billion debt.
The current Labor Government would also claim to be committed to the principles of sound economic management. ‘Kevin 07’ claimed to be an ‘economic conservative’ and kept saying ‘me too’. There was also the posturing and bravado of Lindsay Tanner’s ‘Razor Gangs’ - all trying to create a contrast with the Howard government which they attempted to label as reckless and wasteful.
However, the Rudd Labor Government has already racked up a record of wasteful spending in the order of $4 billion. Examples such as GROCERYchoice, laptops in schools, record spending on consultants and legal fees and wasted tax bonus payments have all contributed. Labor’s waste and mismanagement has seen public money thrown completely to the wind or programs costing far more than they should have.
In response to this the Coalition is introducing a package of two initiatives, including this Bill to strengthen the requirement that value for money be considered in the spending of Commonwealth resources and a Bill to establish a Parliamentary Budget Office similar to the Congressional Budget Office in the United States, but on a smaller scale, to provide better oversight of government spending. These initiatives were announced by the Leader of the Opposition, The Hon Tony Abbott MP in Canberra on 22 June, 2010. If elected, the Coalition will also add achieving ‘value for money’ to the criteria against which senior officials’ performance is judged.
The spending of public monies is regulated by the Financial Management and Accountability Act (1997) and its regulations. Section 44(3) of the act requires Agency Chief Executives to promote ‘proper use’ of Commonwealth resources. ‘Proper use’ means ‘...efficient, effective and ethical use that is not inconsistent with the policies of the Commonwealth. The principal of value for money is not included directly in the legislation but rather is the core principle of procurement introduced in the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines which are made under the regulations to the act. Therefore, achieving value for money is not currently a formally binding legislative obligation.
This Bill adds value for money to the definition in Section 44(3) of the Act. This addition will strengthen the obligation on governments to seek value for money when spending public funds and places a more explicit obligation on Agency Chief Executives to promote such spending within their Agencies.
It is the Coalition’s belief that this two part package will improve transparency and accountability in government spending and be an impediment to future Labor governments engaging in further reckless spending. This initiative will, over time, improve the quality of Government spending regardless of who holds the reins of power, thus ensuring that all Australians get better value for money and restoring public confidence in Government procurement and spending.
This Bill and the establishment of the Parliamentary Budget Office will ensure that no future government will be able to spend taxpayers’ money without greater fiscal and legal scrutiny. Governments will not always like additional scrutiny and accountability, but given the reckless, wasteful and irresponsible spending of the current Labor Government over the past two and a half years, the Coalition believes this initiative is timely and urgently needed.
I commend the Bill to the Senate.
Senator BARNETT
—I seek leave to continue my remarks later.
Leave granted.