

- Title
HEALTH INSURANCE AMENDMENT (PROVIDER NUMBER REVIEW) BILL 2007
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
26-03-2007
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
- Page
59
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2007-03-26/0121
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUDGET
-
NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 2006
-
In Committee
- Johnston, Sen David
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Johnston, Sen David
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Johnston, Sen David
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Johnston, Sen David
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Johnston, Sen David
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Johnston, Sen David
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Johnston, Sen David
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Johnston, Sen David
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Johnston, Sen David
- Johnston, Sen David
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Johnston, Sen David
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Johnston, Sen David
- Johnston, Sen David
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Johnston, Sen David
- Johnston, Sen David
- Division
- Procedural Text
-
In Committee
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Future Fund
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Broadband
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Broadband
(Hurley, Sen Annette, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Future Fund
(Troeth, Sen Judith, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Broadband
(Moore, Sen Claire, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
National Security
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Johnston, Sen David) -
Climate Change
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Minchin, Sen Nick)
-
Future Fund
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTION TIME: RULING ON SUPPLEMENTARY QUESTIONS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- FOOD SAFETY (TRANS FATS) BILL 2007
- PROFESSOR TANYA REINHART
- WORLD DAY FOR WATER
- MURRAY-DARLING BASIN
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- MR DAVID HICKS
- IRAQ
- EUTHANASIA
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- HEALTH INSURANCE AMENDMENT (PROVIDER NUMBER REVIEW) BILL 2007
- NON-PROLIFERATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2006 [2007]
- COMMITTEES
- NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 2006
- EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WELFARE TO WORK AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES) BILL 2006
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 59
Senator COLBECK (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Finance and Administration) (4:19 PM)
—I move:
That this bill be now read a second time.
I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in Hansard.
Leave granted.
The speech read as follows—
HEALTH INSURANCE AMENDMENT (PROVIDER NUMBER REVIEW) BILL 2007
This Bill proposes an amendment to the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) relating to the arrangements for reviewing the operation of sections 19AA, 3GA and 3GC of the Act, collectively known as the Medicare provider number legislation.
These amendments are the result of the widespread acceptance of the legislation since its introduction in 1996, and aim to change the frequency of the review from two to five years.
The Medicare provider number legislation contained within section 19AA of the Act was introduced in 1996. At the time of its introduction it was considered a contentious move as it was perceived it could harm the future employment opportunities of junior doctors.
In 1999, a review of the legislation found that these concerns were misplaced, and that the legislation was working well. In 2001, the Act was amended to require a biennial report on the operation of the legislation.
The 2003 and 2005 biennial reviews found that the legislation continued to be well accepted and was raising the quality of general practice services to the community. There was also broad agreement that the operation of section 19AA of the Act had certainly not exacerbated any medical workforce shortages.
During the 2005 biennial review the frequency of the review process was questioned with a view to extending the period between reviews.
The Bill proposes to retain the review process, but change the interval from two to five years, with the next review report to be tabled in Parliament no later than 31 December 2010.
Debate (on motion by Senator Colbeck) adjourned.