

- Title
BILLS
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Making Marine Parks Accountable) Bill 2012
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
11-10-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
DEPUTY PRESIDENT, The
- Page
7966
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Thorp, Sen Lin
- Stage
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Making Marine Parks Accountable) Bill 2012
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/17882b8a-dc1d-4551-8f35-099917c16db8/0011
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BILLS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- BUSINESS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Amendment Bill 2012
- Customs Amendment (Smuggled Tobacco) Bill 2012
- National Portrait Gallery of Australia Bill 2012, National Portrait Gallery of Australia (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2012
- Customs Amendment (Smuggled Tobacco) Bill 2012, Explanatory Memorandum
- Migration Legislation Amendment (Student Visas) Bill 2012
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Brandis, Sen George, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Bali Bombings
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Carbon Pricing
(Williams, Sen John, Ludwig, Sen Joe) - Solar Energy
-
Carbon Pricing
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Rural and Regional Services
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Union Funds
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Wong, Sen Penny) -
International Year of Co-operatives
(Madigan, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
South Australian Economy
(Edwards, Sen Sean, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Carbon Pricing
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Clean Energy (Charges—Excise) Amendment Bill 2012, Clean Energy (Charges—Customs) Amendment Bill 2012, Excise Tariff Amendment (Per-tonne Carbon Price Equivalent) Bill 2012, Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas (Import Levy) Amendment (Per-tonne Carbon Price Equivalent) Bill 2012, Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas (Manufacture Levy) Amendment (Per-tonne Carbon Price Equivalent) Bill 2012, Clean Energy (Unit Issue Charge—Auctions) Amendment Bill 2012
- Social and Community Services Pay Equity Special Account Bill 2012, Social and Community Services Pay Equity Special Account (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2012
- Dental Benefits Amendment Bill 2012, Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Further 2012 Budget and Other Measures) Bill 2012
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1983)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government (Question No. 2012)
(Whish-Wilson, Sen Peter, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 2098)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Ministerial Staff: iPad and iPhones (Question No. 2101)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Defence: Consultancy (Question No. 2106)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Defence (Question No. 2109)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Homelessness (Question No. 2115)
(Payne, Sen Marise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Housing Assistance and Homelessness (Question No. 2116)
(Payne, Sen Marise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Treasury: Official Hospitality (Question No. 2118)
(Bushby, Sen David, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Professor Ian Chubb (Question No. 2123)
(Bushby, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question Nos 2125 and 2126)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence (Question No. 2129)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 2130)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
HRL Dual Gas Pty Ltd (Question No. 2132)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Browse Joint Venture (Question No. 2134)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (Question No. 2137)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 2143)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Small Business (Question No. 2145)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence (Question No. 2146)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Health and Ageing (Question Nos 2150 and 2151)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Human Services (Question No. 2152)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Commercial Horse Assistance Payment Scheme (Question No. 2155)
(Williams, Sen John, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1983)
Page: 7966
Senator THORP (Tasmania) (11:48): I rise to speak against this Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Making Marine Parks Accountable) Bill 2012. In this country we have a huge network of national parks that protect our most pristine natural landscapes for generations to come. Our oceans contain fragile marine life and that deserves protection too. The government is working hard to protect and sustainably manage our marine environment.
The year 2012 will go down as a landmark year for marine conservation in Australia. This year the government is finalising the largest ever addition to our national network of marine reserves, the largest marine reserve network in the world. The government's decision is the outcome of a transparent, science driven process undertaken over several years. We have engaged in meaningful consultation with stakeholders and conducted a comprehensive socioeconomic impact evaluation of the marine reserves proposal. This bill is an attempt by those opposite to grandstand and criticise improved marine planning.
Stakeholder views were considered and comprehensively addressed in the Senate inquiry held last year into the bill. The statements made in the recent media by those opposite about marine reserves and planning are incorrect and grossly exaggerate the actual impacts on commercial and recreational fishers. The claim that the government is locking out commercial and recreational fishers is false. As I have said, the government's decision is the outcome of a transparent process in which science, socioeconomic analysis and stakeholder and public consultation all play key roles in achieving a balanced outcome. Analysis undertaken by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences estimates that around one per cent of the national annual value of wild catch fisheries production in Australia will be displaced by the proposed reserves.
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Order! The time allotted for this debate has expired.
Debate interrupted.