Reconsideration, and or rejection of minute No. 3 of meeting held on 10.7.79.

Minute No. 3, largely pertaining to the agricultural dilemma at H.V., showed itself to be an untrue and devious representation of the subjects under discussion at the time of the meeting, manifesting no more or less than a personal interpretation, if not a deformation of that subject matter, by the minutes secretary K. D. Scholz.

Comments of great significance showing foresight, accurate planning, quotations of facts and figures and viability for future plans, by self and J. Peterfeldt, were totally ignored and failed to be recorded at all. Statements of similar calibre by and on behalf of N. Brown, W. Bowen, and Lester Rosendale, suffered the same fate. During most of these discussions, Mr L. van der Hoek, was conveniently kept isolated and failed to be consulted.

It is therefore unanimously agreed that minute No. 3, and the untrue, and devious, if not damaging manner in which it has been thrown together, be deleted and or disregarded, as it is in part untrue, contains hints and fabrications solely influenced by the minutes secretary, and therefore not a record but a personal opinion to be declared null and void. Failing to honestly and accurately record discussions held.