

- Title
HVP No 69 - 20 September 2011
10 DISCUSSION OF MATTER OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE—BORDER PROTECTION
- Database
House Votes and Proceedings
- Date
20-09-2011
- Source
House of Reps
- Number
69
- Page
929
- Status
Final
- Main Committee
no
- System Id
chamber/votes/2011-09-20/0011
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
House Votes and Proceedings
-
House
- 1 MEETING OF THE HOUSE
- 2 MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE
- 3 DOCUMENT
- 4 MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE—NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM AMENDMENT (NATIONAL HEALTH PERFORMANCE AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
- 5 EXTRADITION AND MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011—REPORT FROM MAIN COMMITTEE
- 6 CLEAN ENERGY BILL 2011
- 7 QUESTIONS
- 8 DOCUMENTS
- 9 DOCUMENT—MOTION TO TAKE NOTE OF DOCUMENT
- 10 DISCUSSION OF MATTER OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE—BORDER PROTECTION
- 11 PENSION REFORM—MINISTERIAL STATEMENT
- 12 CLEAN ENERGY BILL 2011
- 13 POSTPONEMENT OF ORDERS OF THE DAY
- 14 NAVIGATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011
- 15 PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE AMENDMENT (PARLIAMENTARY BUDGET OFFICER) BILL 2011
- 16 ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENT
- ATTENDANCE
-
House
10 DISCUSSION OF MATTER OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE— Border protection
The House was informed that both Mr Abbott (Leader of the Opposition) and Mr Katter had proposed that definite matters of public importance be submitted to the House for discussion today. In accordance with the provisions of standing order 46, the Speaker had given priority to the matter proposed by Mr Abbott, namely, “The loss of confidence in Australia’s border protection system”.
The proposed discussion having received the necessary support—
Mr Abbott addressed the House.
Discussion ensuing—
Member directed to leave
At 3.55 p.m. the Member for Bowman (Mr Laming) was directed, under standing order 94, to leave the Chamber for one hour for continuing to interject after a warning had been given from the Chair, and he accordingly left the Chamber.
Discussion continuing—
Member directed to leave
At 3.56 p.m. the Member for Mayo (Mr Briggs) was directed, under standing order 94, to leave the Chamber for one hour for continuing to interject after a warning had been given from the Chair, and he accordingly left the Chamber.
Discussion continued.
Discussion concluded.