

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2010-12
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- General Business—Consideration of Private Senators’ Bills
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
- General Business
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged or Negatived
-
Questions On Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 28 September 2010
- Notice given 8 December 2010
- Notice given 25 March 2011
- Notice given 17 August 2011
- Notice given 12 September 2011
- Notice given 20 September 2011
- Notice given 21 September 2011
- Notice given 22 September 2011
- Notice given 28 October 2011
- Notice given 31 October 2011
- Notice given 2 November 2011
- Notice given 10 November 2011
- Notice given 19 December 2011
- Notice given 20 December 2011
- Notice given 16 January 2012
- Notice given 19 January 2012
- Notice given 27 January 2012
- Notice given 31 January 2012
- Notice given 2 February 2012
- Notice given 3 February 2012
- Notice given 6 February 2012
- Notice given 8 February 2012
- Notice given 9 February 2012
- Notice given 10 February 2012
- Notice given 15 February 2012
- Notice given 16 February 2012
- Notice given 17 February 2012
- Notice given 23 February 2012
- Notice given 24 February 2012
- Notice given 27 February 2012
- Notice given 28 February 2012
- Notice given 29 February 2012
- Notice given 5 March 2012
- Notice given 8 March 2012
- Notice given 9 March 2012
- Notice given 13 March 2012
- Notice given 15 March 2012
- Notice given 16 March 2012
- Notice given 20 March 2012
- Notice given 21 March 2012
- Answers to Estimates Questions on Notice
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- Guide to the Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 16 February 2012
1557 Senator Ludlam: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities ( transferred to the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy on 22 February 2012) —With reference to the Radiocommunications Class Licence for wireless audio devices:
(1) Once a decision has been made in respect to changes to the class licence, how would typical users of wireless audio equipment, such as a teacher, priest, aerobics instructor, guitarist or small businessperson, find out exactly what spectrum the device they own uses.
(2) Based on the department’s current modelling, how many wireless audio devices will become:
(a) non-compliant with the class licence; and
(b) unusable due to digital restack.
(3) Does the department have any advice as to whether there will be sufficient new stock of compliant wireless audio devices in Australia to replace all of the non-compliant devices prior to the switchover date.
(4) What is the expected economic impact on Australia if the current fleet of wireless audio devices is not replaced.
(5) What will the typical user’s options be if their wireless audio device is no longer compliant.
(6) What kind of compliance action would typical users of wireless audio equipment be open to if they fail to replace their non-compliant equipment prior to the amendment of the class licence.
(7) Has the department increased its budget for compliance enforcement in respect to wireless audio devices for the period following the changeover date.