

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2010-12
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- General Business—Consideration of Private Senators’ Bills
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
- General Business
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged or Negatived
-
Questions On Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 28 September 2010
- Notice given 8 December 2010
- Notice given 25 March 2011
- Notice given 17 August 2011
- Notice given 23 August 2011
- Notice given 12 September 2011
- Notice given 19 September 2011
- Notice given 20 September 2011
- Notice given 21 September 2011
- Notice given 22 September 2011
- Notice given 28 October 2011
- Notice given 31 October 2011
- Notice given 2 November 2011
- Notice given 8 November 2011
- Notice given 10 November 2011
- Notice given 23 November 2011
- Notice given 19 December 2011
- Notice given 20 December 2011
- Notice given 16 January 2012
- Notice given 19 January 2012
- Notice given 27 January 2012
- Notice given 31 January 2012
- Notice given 2 February 2012
- Notice given 3 February 2012
- Notice given 6 February 2012
- Notice given 8 February 2012
- Notice given 9 February 2012
- Notice given 10 February 2012
- Notice given 15 February 2012
- Notice given 16 February 2012
- Notice given 17 February 2012
- Notice given 23 February 2012
- Notice given 24 February 2012
- Notice given 27 February 2012
- Notice given 28 February 2012
- Notice given 29 February 2012
- Notice given 5 March 2012
- Notice given 8 March 2012
- Notice given 9 March 2012
- Notice given 13 March 2012
- Answers to Estimates Questions on Notice
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- Guide to the Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 31 January 2012
1524 Senator Abetz: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship—With reference to the Pontville Immigration Detention Centre:
(1) How many ambulance visits have there been to the detention centre since it was opened.
(2) How many ambulance visits have been necessitated for the treatment of detainees.
(3) Who bears the cost of ambulance visits to the detention centre.
(4) For what types of medical emergency were the ambulances required.
(5) In regard to the reported hunger strike:
(a) how many detainees have been on a hunger strike at any one time;
(b) how many have required hospitalisation or on-site medical treatment as a result of a hunger strike;
(c) on what date did the first hunger strike take place and how many participated in that hunger strike; and
(d) what was the basis of the hunger strike.
(6) Given that it has been claimed that certain representations were made to detainees as to community detention and the processing of their applications, can the Minister confirm that no such representations were made by departmental officials or Serco staff; if so, what advice can be provided as to the source of misapprehensions under which the detainees suffered in relation to community detention and the expeditious processing of their applications.
(7) Are the detainees taken on day trips; if so:
(a) how many day trips have been undertaken; and
(b) can a list be provided detailing those day trips, including:
(i) the location, for example, visits to the zoo or cinema, and
(ii) the associated costs.