Download PDF Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2010-12
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- General Business—Consideration of Private Senators’ Bills
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
- General Business
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged or Negatived
-
Questions On Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 28 September 2010
- Notice given 8 December 2010
- Notice given 25 March 2011
- Notice given 17 August 2011
- Notice given 23 August 2011
- Notice given 12 September 2011
- Notice given 19 September 2011
- Notice given 20 September 2011
- Notice given 21 September 2011
- Notice given 22 September 2011
- Notice given 28 October 2011
- Notice given 31 October 2011
- Notice given 2 November 2011
- Notice given 8 November 2011
- Notice given 10 November 2011
- Notice given 23 November 2011
- Notice given 19 December 2011
- Notice given 20 December 2011
- Notice given 16 January 2012
- Notice given 19 January 2012
- Notice given 27 January 2012
- Notice given 31 January 2012
- Notice given 2 February 2012
- Notice given 3 February 2012
- Notice given 6 February 2012
- Notice given 8 February 2012
- Notice given 9 February 2012
- Notice given 10 February 2012
- Notice given 15 February 2012
- Notice given 16 February 2012
- Notice given 17 February 2012
- Notice given 23 February 2012
- Notice given 24 February 2012
- Notice given 27 February 2012
- Notice given 28 February 2012
- Notice given 29 February 2012
- Notice given 5 March 2012
- Notice given 8 March 2012
- Notice given 9 March 2012
- Notice given 13 March 2012
- Answers to Estimates Questions on Notice
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- Guide to the Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 27 January 2012
1523 Senator Humphries: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs—With reference to the Federal Government’s proposed poker machine mandatory pre-commitment trial:
(1) How was the Australian Capital Territory selected as the site of the trial.
(2) On what date were the following individuals first consulted on the possibility of the Australian Capital Territory being involved in the trial:
(a) the Chief Minister of the Australian Capital Territory;
(b) the Member for Fraser;
(c) the Member for Canberra; and
(d) Senator Lundy.
(3) Were any state governments consulted on their possible inclusion in the trial; if so, which states and on what date.
(4) How will the compensation package be divided and assigned to clubs in the Australian Capital Territory.
(5) Can the complete details of how the pre-commitment trial will operate be provided.