

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
2011-12
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
- dps-notice-section
- Dissent from Ruling
- Business of the Senate
- Government Business
- Orders of the Day relating to Committee Reports and Government Responses and Auditor-General’s Reports
- General Business
- Business for Future Consideration
- Bills Referred to Committees
- Bills Discharged or Negatived
-
Questions On Notice
- Questions remaining unanswered
- Notice given 28 September 2010
- Notice given 8 December 2010
- Notice given 25 March 2011
- Notice given 30 May 2011
- Notice given 21 July 2011
- Notice given 17 August 2011
- Notice given 23 August 2011
- Notice given 29 August 2011
- Notice given 12 September 2011
- Notice given 19 September 2011
- Notice given 20 September 2011
- Notice given 21 September 2011
- Notice given 22 September 2011
- Notice given 28 October 2011
- Notice given 31 October 2011
- Notice given 1 November 2011
- Notice given 2 November 2011
- Notice given 4 November 2011
- Notice given 7 November 2011
- Notice given 9 November 2011
- Notice given 10 November 2011
- Notice given 14 November 2011
- Notice given 18 November 2011
- Notice given 22 November 2011
- Notice given 23 November 2011
- Notice given 25 November 2011
- Notice given 28 November 2011
- Notice given 5 December 2011
- Notice given 12 December 2011
- Notice given 13 December 2011
- Notice given 15 December 2011
- Notice given 19 December 2011
- Notice given 20 December 2011
- Notice given 16 January 2012
- Notice given 18 January 2012
- Notice given 19 January 2012
- Notice given 20 January 2012
- Notice given 24 January 2012
- Notice given 27 January 2012
- Notice given 31 January 2012
- Answers to Estimates Questions on Notice
- Orders of the Senate
- Contingent Notices of Motion
- Temporary Chairs of Committees
- Categories of Committees
- Committees
- Senate Appointments to Statutory Authorities
- Ministerial Representation
- Guide to the Notice Paper
-
SENATE NOTICE PAPER
Notice given 22 November 2011
1473 Senator Bob Brown: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Defence—In regard to the Facebook page entitled ‘Steve Austin’ (the webpage) which targeted serving gay and lesbian Defence members and to which current and serving members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) subscribed or contributed:
(1) Can a list be provided of each rank and the number of persons who hold that rank of the defence members who contributed or subscribed to the webpage.
(2) Were the ranks inferior or superior to that of the members of the ADF targeted by the website.
(3) Of the contributors and/or subscribers to the webpage who were junior in rank to those targeted, was a charge of insubordination pursuant to section 26 of the Defence Force Disciplinary Act 1982 (the Act) contemplated; if not, why not.
(4) What is the difference under the Act between conduct and language that is vilifying of a superior officer and conduct and language that is ‘threatening, insubordinate or insulting’.
(5) Does vilifying behaviour of an officer constitute insubordination under the Act or any other disciplinary provisions of the ADF.
(6) Does the Act make unlawful language or conduct that is vilifying of a superior officer.
(7) Can a list be provided of the laws, rules or regulations which apply to Defence Members prohibiting vilifying behaviour.
(8) Of the laws, rules or regulations listed above, can an explanation be provided as to why Defence members have not been proceeded against pursuant to those laws, rules or regulations.
(9) What was the name and rank of the officer who decided not to proceed against Defence members who contributed or subscribed to the webpage.
(10) With reference to the Defence Instruction (General) and, in particular, the provisions of the instruction relating to Unacceptable Behaviour and Workplace Bullying, can an explanation be provided as to whether vilifying behaviour is or is not:
(a) unacceptable behaviour;
(b) bullying;
(c) insubordination;
(d) insulting; or
(e) threatening.
(11) Did the conduct of the webpage and participation on the webpage amount to vilification.
(12) Can a copy of the legal advice provided to the ADF regarding this matter be provided.
(13) Is vilifying behaviour contrary to military discipline and order.
1474 Senator Bob Brown: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Defence—In regard to the Facebook page entitled ‘Steve Austin’ (the webpage) which targeted serving gay and lesbian Defence members and to which current and serving members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) subscribed or contributed:
(1) On what date were all persons targeted and named on this webpage advised of this fact by the ADF.
(2) Has the Minister been briefed on the anti-Semitic and Nazi linkages connected with the webpage.
(3) Are persons who were targeted by the webpage required to continue working with Defence members who subscribed or contributed to the webpage.
(4) Has the ADF warned its members to ‘check their privacy settings’ when joining webpages that might be regarded as hate and vilification sites.
(5) Is there a list of words and expressions that are vilifying, insulting, racist, sexist or homophobic that are explicitly prohibited from being used by Defence members.
1475 Senator Bob Brown: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Defence—I refer to the Facebook page entitled ‘Steve Austin’ (the webpage) which targeted serving gay and lesbian Defence members and to which current and serving members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) subscribed or contributed:
(1) Of those serving Defence members who chose to join this webpage and /or contribute to its content, how many have been subject to any discipline.
(2) If Defence members were subject to discipline, what form did this take and when did it occur.
(3) Have any Defence members who chose to subscribe to the webpage or contribute to its content, been issued with a Notice to Show Cause as to why they should continue to serve in the military; if not, why not.
(4) When did officials within the ADF become aware of this webpage.
(5) On what date did military officials take action against the webpage and its subscribers and what form did this action take.
(6) On what date was a formal complaint lodged against this webpage.
(7) When was the first interview of a Defence member conducted.
(8) Of the Defence members who contributed or participated on the webpage, how many were interviewed and how many provided:
(a) written responses;
(b) verbal responses; or
(c) written and verbal responses.
1476 Senator Bob Brown: To ask the Minister representing the Minister for Defence—In regard to the Facebook page entitled ‘Steve Austin’ (the webpage) which targeted serving gay and lesbian Defence members and to which current and serving members of the Australian Defence Force (ADF) subscribed or contributed:
(1) When did members of the ADF become aware of this webpage by choosing to subscribe to it or by contributing to its content.
(2) How many serving members of the ADF specifically took action to subscribe to this webpage or to contribute to its content.
(3) Is there a mandatory reporting requirement for abusive or vilifying conduct in the ADF; if so, how many Defence members who were aware of this webpage and/or contributed to it informed the authorities about the abuse and vilification it contained and advocated.
(4) What instrument creates a mandatory requirement to report abusive or vilifying conduct.
(5) If none of the Defence members who subscribed to this webpage and/or contributed to its content reported the webpage to military authorities, what action has the ADF subsequently taken to reprimand or penalise such Defence members for their inaction in reporting this abuse.