

- Title
NOTICES
Withdrawal
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-09-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
6825
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stage
- Type
- Context
NOTICES
- System Id
chamber/hansards/fab7f92c-00c9-4a5f-be69-4f49ac44396a/0043
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Asylum Seekers
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Superannuation
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Asylum Seekers
(Brandis, Sen George, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Coal Seam Gas
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Asylum Seekers
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Pensions and Benefits
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Asylum Seekers
(Back, Sen Chris, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Carbon Pricing
(Madigan, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband
(Furner, Sen Mark, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Asylum Seekers
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Financial Services and Superannuation (Question No. 57)
(Johnston, Sen David, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 896)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities: Program Funding (Question No. 917)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
National Water Commission (Question No. 920)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities: Accommodation (Question No. 923)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 925)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Emergency Short Message Service (Question No. 1034)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1055)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Northern Territory Communities: Swimming Pools (Question No. 1086)
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government: Staffing (Question No. 1162)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Sherry, Sen Nick)
-
Financial Services and Superannuation (Question No. 57)
Page: 6825
Senator SIEWERT (Western Australia—Australian Greens Whip) (12:43): by leave—The Greens have been on the record for a long time supporting the pay equity case for community sector workers, believing very strongly that those workers are an essential part of our community. They deliver absolutely essential services. We have been strongly supportive of that case. We are also strongly supportive of the not-for-profit sector in general. We are concerned about any unintended consequences for not-for-profit organisations. So we want to make sure there are no adverse consequences, while supporting pay equity for the workers, which we believe is essential. We are aware there are some problems with this regulation. The list, in particular, is of concern—the issues around which organisations have received funding from the state government. We are aware the state government has put in $414 million to help with that. So the issue is how to fix the situation, which I am convinced everybody knows and wants to get fixed.
The key part of the announcement here is that workers will be paid as if this regulation took effect from 1 October. In other words, workers will not be disadvantaged by repealing this instrument and then fixing it. Workers will essentially be back paid from whenever this new instrument takes effect. Workers will receive back pay as if this regulation came into effect from 1 October. That is particularly important—in other words, workers are not being disadvantaged by some of the unfortunate errors that have occurred with this regulation.