Download Fragment

Wednesday, 15 June 2011
Page: 2957

Taxation

(Question No. 425)

Senator Cormann asked the Minister representing the Treasurer, upon notice, on 10 March 2011:

With reference to Taxation Determination 2010/D6:

(1) What is the policy intention of the proposed measure.

(2) How does the proposed measure enable the policy intention to be achieved.

(3) Is the effect of the proposed measure revenue neutral:

(a) if so, how has revenue neutrality been achieved;

(b) have other saving measures been needed to achieve revenue neutrality;

(c) if not, how much revenue is expected to be raised as a result of the measure; and

(d) can the annual numbers for the forward estimates period be provided, and any further information covering the longer term.

(4) Have the likely administrative and compliance costs of implementing the proposed measure been assessed; if so, what are they.

(5) (a) What stakeholders will be directly affected by the measure;

(b) have these stakeholders been involved in consultation prior to and during the development of the measure;

(c) what consultation has the Government been engaged in; and

(d) have independent bodies or experts been involved in the consultation process.

(6) Is this proposed measure a government response to an identified problem; if so, what problem is it addressing.

(7) Were any alternatives considered before this approach was proposed, if so:

(a) can details of those alternatives be provided; and

(b) why was it decided that those options would not be implemented.

(8) Will inaction pose a risk to the integrity of the tax system or broader government administration; if so, how would you rate that risk.

(9) What modelling has been carried out in developing the proposed measure.

(10) Have the broader implications of the implementation of the measure on the economy been forecast; if so, what are they.

(11) Have international comparisons been considered and does the proposed measure accord with international 'best practice'.

Senator Wong: The Treasurer has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:

Taxation Determination 2010/D6 is not a proposed measure. Taxation determinations do not alter the existing tax law, but rather set out the Commissioner of Taxation's interpretation of how the existing law works. In a determination, the Commissioner is simply expressing his view of the law enacted by Parliament and he applies accepted principles of statutory interpretation in doing so.

Determinations are not legally binding on taxpayers (that is, they do not create legal obligations under the tax law for them). Once finalised, they are only binding on the Commissioner. Their legal effect is to protect taxpayers who choose to follow the Commissioner's views expressed in them. Taxation determinations have no policy intent, and the government has no involvement in the issuing of taxation determinations. The Commissioner releases draft taxation determinations for public comment before finalising them.

Many taxation determinations are considered by the ATO's Public Rulings Panel. The Panel advises the Commissioner on the issues proposed to be dealt with in taxation rulings and determinations and is made up of senior ATO officers and external experts.

Taxation determinations do not have a revenue impact on the forward estimates because, as far as the law allows, the Commissioner interprets the law consistent with policy intent on which revenue estimates were based. However, they may have a compliance leverage impact by protecting the forward estimates to the extent that revenue is at risk from taxpayers not applying the law properly.

The ATO is therefore unable to provide an answer to questions (1), (2), (3), (5) (c), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10) and (11).

(4) Yes. It is not anticipated that taxpayers will have to change any common practices or systems to comply with the extra clarification provided by this draft Determination as it deals with incidental costs of disposal of shares which are a common element of capital gains tax cost bases and for which taxpayers would have existing systems or practices in place to deal with. The draft Determination does not introduce any new treatment, over and above standard capital gains tax rules, that might require any new or amended practices to comply with the treatment explained in the draft determination.

(5) (a) Micro enterprises, small and medium enterprises and large business may be affected by this Determination, depending on how they propose to apply the capital gains tax provisions. No specific industries will be affected.

(5) (b) The normal consultation process for determinations is being followed. The draft Determination was published on www.ato.gov.au on 17 November 2010 and public consultation closed on 17 December 2010.

(5) (d) The Public Rulings Panel provided advice in the development of this draft Determination.