- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Workplace Relations
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
17-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4668
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Pratt, Sen Louise
- Responder
Evans, Sen Christopher
- Speaker
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/f627fea7-37b2-4b0b-b685-55165346dfb9/0052
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
BILLS
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Feeney, Sen David
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
-
In Committee
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Superannuation
(Singh, Sen Lisa, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Energy Efficiency
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Wong, Sen Penny) -
James Price Point
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Carbon Pricing
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Workplace Relations
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Carbon Pricing
(Madigan, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Forestry
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Aged Care
(Polley, Sen Helen, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Member for Dobell
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Operation Talisman Sabre 2011 (Question No. 449)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 467)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 468)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 469)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 471)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 472)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 473)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 475)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 476)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 477)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 478)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 479)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 480)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 481)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 482)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Operation Talisman Sabre 2011 (Question No. 563)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 635)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 636)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Treasury (Question No. 683)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (Question No. 684)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Live Animal Exports (Question No. 688)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Centrelink (Question No. 689)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Heritage Assessments (Question No. 690)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 700)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 701)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 702)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 703)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Taxation (Question No. 706)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Question No. 708)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Taxation (Question No. 724)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 727)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (Question No. 728)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Mining (Question No. 833)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Tourism (Question No. 836)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 837)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (Question No. 841)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Operation Talisman Sabre 2011 (Question No. 449)
Page: 4668
Workplace Relations
Senator PRATT (Western Australia) (14:29): My question is to the Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations, Senator Evans. Can the minister please inform the Senate how the government has protected penalty rates for hardworking Australian families, and how important these rates are in helping families meet the cost-of-living pressures they face?
Opposition senators interjecting—
Senator CHRIS EVANS (Western Australia—Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:30): I thank the senator for her question and I can assure Senator Abetz I will not be mentioning him six times; he is not that relevant. It is an important question because Labor have delivered on our promise to consign the coalition's Work Choices legislation to the dustbin of history and to put in place the Fair Work Act. That act ensures that workplaces are underpinned by fairness and delivers flexibility and opportunities for employers and employees.
We all know what Work Choices meant for hardworking Australians. Under that legislation workers could be forced to sign a take it or leave it AWA which stripped away basic entitlements without compensation and without the oversight of an independent umpire. The facts speak for themselves. Under Work Choices 64 per cent of AWAs cut annual leave loading and 63 per cent reduced penalty rates for ordinary working people. Women workers were particularly badly hit by those changes.
What the Liberal Party do not understand is that millions of Australian families rely on penalty rates to help meet their everyday costs. Those penalty rates are part of their weekly budgets and help pay for the food, the mortgage and the standard of living that they enjoy. The Liberal Party's intent to undermine penalty rates is fundamentally an attack on the wages and conditions of Australian families. They compensate people for working antisocial hours, but we have put in place the new better off overall test for enterprise agreements which ensures that those conditions are protected. Penalty rates are an important part of the standard of living of millions of Australians and they need to be supported.
Senator PRATT (Western Australia) (14:32): Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Could the minister please explain what the key measures are that have been put in place to secure and protect penalty rates from being ripped away from Australian families?
Senator CHRIS EVANS (Western Australia—Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:32): I thank the senator for her supplementary question. As we promised the Australian people, the government have ended the take it or leave it AWAs that stripped away wages and conditions such as penalty rates. By introducing the Fair Work Act we have established a fair safety net for employees, one part being the modern industry awards. These awards enshrine entitlements tailored to the specific needs of workers in businesses in a particular industry. Importantly, these modern awards contain entitlements like penalty rates for workers who spend time working on weekends, public holidays or doing shiftwork.
We are proud that our system supports fair compensation for those people working unsociable hours. The Fair Work Act introduced a new better off overall test for new enterprise agreements. That test ensures that Australian workers have their entitlements, including penalty rates, protected. We protect their standard of living through our industrial relations legislation. (Time expired)
Senator Cormann interjecting—
The PRESIDENT: Senator Cormann, I remind you that constant interjection is completely disorderly.
Senator PRATT (Western Australia) (14:33): Mr President, I ask a further supplementary question. Is the minister aware of any threats to the penalty rates for hardworking Australian families?
Opposition senators interjecting—
The PRESIDENT: I will give the call when there is silence. The minister.
Senator CHRIS EVANS (Western Australia—Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:33): Thank you, Mr President. We all know that the greatest threat to the family budget, of course, is the coalition. Last month Tony Abbott endorsed the extreme Work Choices law of the Howard government as good policy and made it clear it continued to have his personal support. He said: 'Work Choices didn't fail because it was bad policy. It failed because it had never been put properly to the people.' So Tony Abbott asserts that the failure of Work Choices was merely a failure of salesmanship not of policy.
We know that the Liberal Party does not change on this question and, despite Senator Abetz trying to keep the talk down and telling people they ought to continue to run the line 'we are working on new policy', we have seen backbencher after backbencher—and of course the return of Peter Reith—arguing the case for abolishing penalty rates and arguing the case to rip Australian families of much needed income. The Liberal Party is a threat to Australian wages. (Time expired)
Honourable senators interjecting—
The PRESIDENT: I am waiting for quiet on both sides. If you want to have the debate, it is after three o'clock. Senator Cameron, this does not help question time.

