- Title
BILLS
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
17-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4627
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/f627fea7-37b2-4b0b-b685-55165346dfb9/0020
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
BILLS
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Feeney, Sen David
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
-
In Committee
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Superannuation
(Singh, Sen Lisa, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Energy Efficiency
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Wong, Sen Penny) -
James Price Point
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Carbon Pricing
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Workplace Relations
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Carbon Pricing
(Madigan, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Forestry
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Aged Care
(Polley, Sen Helen, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Member for Dobell
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Operation Talisman Sabre 2011 (Question No. 449)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 467)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 468)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 469)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 471)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 472)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 473)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 475)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 476)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 477)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 478)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 479)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 480)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 481)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 482)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Operation Talisman Sabre 2011 (Question No. 563)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 635)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 636)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Treasury (Question No. 683)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (Question No. 684)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Live Animal Exports (Question No. 688)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Centrelink (Question No. 689)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Heritage Assessments (Question No. 690)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 700)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 701)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 702)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research (Question No. 703)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Taxation (Question No. 706)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Question No. 708)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Taxation (Question No. 724)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 727)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (Question No. 728)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Mining (Question No. 833)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Tourism (Question No. 836)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 837)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (Question No. 841)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Operation Talisman Sabre 2011 (Question No. 449)
Page: 4627
Senator LUDWIG (Queensland—Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Minister Assisting the Attorney-General on Queensland Floods Recovery) (11:13): Just to reiterate, we are dealing with an agreed amendment under the Carbon Farming Initiative. I know that, for those following this debate, we have certainly ranged quite widely. The reason for that is that the opposition do not agree with this legislation and they are using every opportunity to filibuster. Filibustering is the course that oppositions can occasionally take to delay the passage of legislation. It is unfortunate that they are doing it in such a poor way. Sometimes, though, they do it in a much more entertaining way, one which is perhaps even more relevant to the actual amendment that is currently before the chamber. Unfortunately, here they are not.
Can I say again that, broadly, in combination with measures announced in the government's Clean Energy Future plan, the CFI is likely to improve the productivity and sustainability of Australian agriculture. The Carbon Farming Initiative projects will be most cost effective where they enhance agricultural productivity and deliver environmental co-benefits, such as reducing erosion and salinity or protecting biodiversity. The Carbon Farming Initiative is unlikely to promote what the opposition are now effectively trying to hold onto as their last, single thread of opposition to this bill, which is the conversion of agricultural land to other uses. In all but the most marginal of farming areas it will not be cost effective to undertake revegetation of productive agricultural land, unlike their own policy of direct action where—with no department, no rigour and no modelling—direct action could, in fact, have adverse impacts. It is are far better opportunity for the opposition to agree to the Carbon Farming Initiative, pass the legislation and ensure that farming communities can benefit from what is environmentally and sustainably productive while getting the co-benefits of reducing erosion and salinity and protecting biodiversity and getting the co-benefit of an income stream.

