- Title
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Muckaty Land Trust (Question No. 1785)
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-05-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
3312
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
1785
- Questioner
Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Responder
Evans, Sen Christopher
- Speaker
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/edb45988-55dc-4a02-8239-a916040eb623/0263
Previous Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Budget
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Budget
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Budget
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Housing Supply and Affordability
(Payne, Sen Marise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Education Funding
(Polley, Sen Helen, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Economy
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Aviation
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Lundy, Sen Kate) -
National Disability Insurance Scheme
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Budget
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Broadcasting Services Amendment (Regional Commercial Radio) Bill 2012, Fair Work Amendment (Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry) Bill 2012
- Corporations Amendment (Future of Financial Advice) Bill 2012, Corporations Amendment (Further Future of Financial Advice Measures) Bill 2012
- Customs Amendment (Anti-dumping Improvements) Bill (No. 2) 2012, Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2012
- Customs Tariff Amendment (Schedule 4) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No. 1) Bill 2012
- Health Insurance Amendment (Professional Services Review) Bill 2012
- Migration Legislation Amendment (Student Visas) Bill 2012
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1304)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1581)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1582)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1583)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1584)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 1594)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 1595)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 1601)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Hospitality (Question Nos 1609 and 1611)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Overseas Travel (Question Nos 1612 to 1614)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1625)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1627)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1628)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1630)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research (Question No. 1722)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (Question No. 1723)
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Health Services Union (Question No. 1728)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Muckaty Land Trust (Question No. 1785)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1304)
Page: 3312
Muckaty Land Trust
(Question No. 1785)
Senator Ludlam asked the Minister representing the Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, upon notice, on 26 March 2012:
With reference to the contract signed in June 2007 by the Commonwealth Government, the Muckaty Land Trust and the Northern Land Council, regarding the location of a nuclear waste dump:
(1) Did the Northern Land Council receive a payment of $200 000 from the Commonwealth Government upon the acceptance of the Muckaty Land Trust nomination.
(2) Does the Northern Land Council have a responsibility or liability in relation to the receipt and disbursement of these funds.
(3) If traditional owner signatories wish to withdraw from the contract, will: (a) recipients of funds; and (b) the Northern Land Council, be required to repay funds from the initial disbursement of $200 000.
Senator Chris Evans: The Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and the Minister for Disability Reform provides the following answer to the honourable Senator's question:
(1) Yes. It is noted that the Northern Land Council (NLC) provided detailed advice regarding this payment in oral testimony on 30 March 2010 to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee and in a written response dated 28 April 2010 to questions on notice from the Committee (Senator Ludlam and Senator Crossin).
(2) Under the deed, the NLC was responsible for the receipt and disbursement of the funds for the benefit of the traditional Aboriginal owners and other Aboriginals concerned in relation to the nominated site. The NLC detailed its fulfilment of that responsibility in its oral and written testimony to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee in 2010. Accordingly, the NLC has no liability for these funds.
(3) (a) and (b) The site nomination deed was signed by representatives of the Commonwealth, the NLC and the Muckaty Aboriginal Land Trust, rather than by individual traditional owners in their own right. This accords with the structure and requirements of the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976. Accordingly, any question of individual traditional owners withdrawing from the deed (or associated liability as to payments received) does not legally arise.

