

- Title
BILLS
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4954
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/ded7a81f-0da1-4176-95d0-ec01d2e01c7c/0012
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
BILLS
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Division
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Syria
(Brown, Sen Bob, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Steel Industry
(Thistlethwaite, Sen Matt, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Afghanistan
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Broadband
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Steel Industry
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Mental Health
(Moore, Sen Claire, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Member for Dobell
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Housing
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- FIRST SPEECH
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Nation Building and Jobs Plan (Question No. 437)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 463)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 464)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 465)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 466)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 507)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 508)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 510)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 511)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 512)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 513)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Program Funding (Question No. 514)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 617)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Asylum Seekers (Question No. 687)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Diggerworks (Question Nos 697 and 698)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
National Rental Affordability Scheme (Question No. 719)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Housing Affordability (Question No. 720)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Pontville Detention Centre (Question No. 726)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 736)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 737)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 738)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 739)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 740)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 742)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 743)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 744)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 745)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 747)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 748)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 749)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 751)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 752)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 754)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 755)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 756)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 757)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 758)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Communications (Question No. 760)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Media Monitoring (Question Nos 761 to 763)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Freedom of Information (Question Nos 773 to 775)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 782)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 783)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 785)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 786)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 787)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 788)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 794)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 796)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 797)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 798)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Nation Building and Jobs Plan (Question No. 437)
Page: 4954
Senator BIRMINGHAM (South Australia) (10:17): Minister, thank you for humouring me and ensuring that all of that detail is clearly on the record. I want to indicate that, following discussions with Senator Xenophon, it is our intention to withdraw this amendment. Having spoken to the industry sectors involved and having got the information on the record from the minister this morning, we are of the belief that the government is intending to do the right thing by this industry. I want to make it clear once again that the last thing we want to see is a perverse outcome where projects that were early movers in the abatement of greenhouse gas emissions are somehow penalised, where projects that were early movers are facing a situation of financial disadvantage or where projects that were early movers in fact close down and we have the perverse situation that a bill designed to encourage further abatement and new abatement activities has the consequence of causing early abatement activities to cease to operate.
The industry is taking the government at their word that this process will avoid that outcome and will provide appropriate certainty for the sector. I hope that is the case. We are placing that trust in the government rather than the chamber seeking to exercise its will. We are placing that trust in the process of this legislation. We hope that that trust is not ultimately proven to be misplaced. Once again, we emphasise that this was an issue highlighted by the Senate inquiry. It is a shame that it has taken until this last moment of the legislative debate to solidify a pathway forward on it to ensure that there is some level of certainty for the sector. Hopefully, this is the end of the uncertainty and that they are able to proceed within the month knowing exactly where they stand. Hopefully, that will ensure that the projects, especially the many regional projects in the landfill gas sector, are able to continue and to be supported by this scheme, just as they were previously under a greenhouse-friendly arrangement or the New South Wales government's GGAS scheme.
I again place on the record my thanks to Senator Xenophon for his work with the coalition on this matter, to industry for making sure that we all had this matter brought to our attention and to the Greens and the government for trying to come up with an appropriate resolution. We hope that this resolution sticks and works for the benefit of industry. We will certainly be watching very closely from here.
I seek leave to withdraw the amendments.
Leave granted.