

- Title
BILLS
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4951
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/ded7a81f-0da1-4176-95d0-ec01d2e01c7c/0006
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
BILLS
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Division
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Syria
(Brown, Sen Bob, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Steel Industry
(Thistlethwaite, Sen Matt, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Afghanistan
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Broadband
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Steel Industry
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Mental Health
(Moore, Sen Claire, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Member for Dobell
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Housing
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- FIRST SPEECH
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2010
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Nation Building and Jobs Plan (Question No. 437)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 463)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 464)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 465)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 466)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 507)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 508)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 510)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 511)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 512)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 513)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Program Funding (Question No. 514)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 617)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Asylum Seekers (Question No. 687)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Diggerworks (Question Nos 697 and 698)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
National Rental Affordability Scheme (Question No. 719)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Housing Affordability (Question No. 720)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Pontville Detention Centre (Question No. 726)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 736)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 737)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 738)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 739)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 740)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 742)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 743)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 744)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 745)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 747)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 748)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 749)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 751)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 752)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 754)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 755)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 756)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 757)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 758)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Communications (Question No. 760)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Media Monitoring (Question Nos 761 to 763)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Freedom of Information (Question Nos 773 to 775)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 782)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 783)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 785)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 786)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 787)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 788)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 794)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 796)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 797)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Budget Audit Review (Question No. 798)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Nation Building and Jobs Plan (Question No. 437)
Page: 4951
Senator BIRMINGHAM (South Australia) (10:03): We are picking up from the debate on Friday in relation to this amendment for the landfill gas sector. I have done one better than to speak with Senator Xenophon. I have had the fortune this morning of speaking with Evelyn Ek from his office, who from time to time provides great guidance to many of us in this place on serious issues. Let us remind ourselves that this is an amendment which Senator Xenophon and the coalition have pursued to ensure the landfill gas sector is protected from any perverse or adverse outcomes under this legislation. It is a big issue. We are talking about more than 4,500 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent gases that were recovered or destroyed in 2009 from waste in landfills. Many of those projects could be at risk or at threat of discontinuance should we get this legislation wrong or should the government get the implementation of this legislation wrong. We want to make sure that that outcome is avoided.
I join with Senator Xenophon in thanking Senator Milne for her initial support of the issues raised and ensuring that industry was able to engage in some discussions with the government. It is equally my understanding, having spoken to some of the industry players as well as Ms Ek, that the industry has had further discussions with government, that there is an agreed pathway forward for how the methodology and the time line will be developed and the base lines that will be considered as part of that process.
We want as many guarantees and as much information on the record as the minister is able to provide as to what the guarantees provided to industry are. I posed some questions to the minister on Thursday about how he thought he could achieve the timing that Senator Milne had alluded to and that he had alluded to in the debate on Thursday. If he could for the benefit of the chamber and the record provide us with the detail of the time line for discussions with industry and finalisation of the methodology, the approach that is going to be applied to the base line in this regard and the government's understanding of what this will mean for the existing projects, that would certainly assist us in hopefully proceeding with this debate, dealing with this amendment and, most importantly, providing certainty for early adopters and early movers who have invested significantly and done so much to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas that comes off landfill gas facilities.