

- Title
BUSINESS
Consideration of Legislation
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
09-05-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
2967
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Milne, Sen Christine
- Stage
- Type
- Context
BUSINESS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/c8a1094c-1e25-46e2-b93a-113c9a96ed31/0177
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
- Corporations Amendment (Phoenixing and Other Measures) Bill 2012
- Family Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- Social Security Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory Bill 2012, Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2011
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- PARTY OFFICE HOLDERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Budget
(Milne, Sen Christine, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Budget
(Brandis, Sen George, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Budget
(Brown, Sen Carol, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Budget
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Madigan, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Budget
(Sinodinos, Sen Arthur, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Budget
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
-
BUSINESS
-
Consideration of Legislation
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Fifield, Sen Mitch
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Fisher, Sen Mary Jo
- Williams, Sen John
- Division
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Fifield, Sen Mitch
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Division
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Division
- Division
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
-
Consideration of Legislation
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Prime Minister and Cabinet (Question No. 1736)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1753)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Resources and Energy, and Tourism (Question Nos 1754 and 1755)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Social Inclusion (Question No. 1762)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Human Services: Staffing (Question No. 1767)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Public Service and Integrity (Question No. 1773)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Muckaty Land Trust (Question No. 1784)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Muckaty Land Trust (Question No. 1786)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Uranium Exports (Question No. 1787)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Question No. 1788)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Gambling (Question No. 1795)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Prime Minister (Question No. 1799)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Prime Minister and Cabinet (Question No. 1736)
Page: 2967
Senator MILNE (Tasmania—Leader of the Australian Greens) (16:28): I held a press conference at about one o'clock today and announced that the Australian Greens would support the Family Assistance and Other Legislation Amendment (Schoolkids Bonus Budget Measures) Bill and support the process to get it through the parliament in the timeframe that the government proposed. The government has made it clear that it wants this bill through by the end of the week in order for the money to flow in this financial year.
I have also made it clear that this is not the way that the Australian Greens would have spent the money—we would have preferred to see it go towards implementing the Gonski review; we would like to have seen $5 billion go into education. However, that is not how the government has chosen to spend the money. Having said that, this measure will provide access to assistance to more low-income people than currently get the benefit. I will talk about that when we get to the substantive debate.