

- Title
BILLS
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
28-02-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
1070
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Evans, Sen Christopher
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/bc5e9c05-ab3b-42a4-853e-b6dc331247e3/0125
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
-
BILLS
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
-
In Committee
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Parry, Sen Stephen (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Scullion, Sen Nigel
- Fawcett, Sen David (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Division
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
-
In Committee
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Dental Health
(Di Natale, Sen Richard, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Defence Force Academy
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Economy
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Workplace Relations
(Back, Sen Chris, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Indigenous Suicide
(Wright, Sen Penny, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Small Business
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Food and Grocery Industry
(Gallacher, Sen Alex, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Dental Health
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- DOCUMENTS
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
-
BILLS
- Higher Education Support Amendment (VET FEE-HELP and Other Measures) Bill 2011
- Building and Construction Industry Improvement Amendment (Transition to Fair Work) Bill 2012
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
-
In Committee
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Scullion, Sen Nigel
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Scullion, Sen Nigel
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Fisher, Sen Mary Jo (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Division
-
In Committee
- Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- DOCUMENTS
-
ADJOURNMENT
- Marshall, Sen Gavin (The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
- Mining
- Human Trafficking
- Mental Health
- Anglesea Barracks
- Ovarian Cancer
- World War II
- Australian Public Service
- Ovarian Cancer
- Havel, Mr Vaclav
- Western Australia: Infrastructure, Building the Education Revolution Program
- Trade Unions
- World Population
- Gillard Government
- Schools
- Vietnam: Human Rights
- World War II
- World War II, Livestock Exports, Private Health Insurance
- Colvin, Ms Marie, Sri Lanka, Asian Forum of Parliamentarians on Population and Development
- Member for Dobell
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1070
Senator CHRIS EVANS (Western Australia—Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (17:42): I think there is a misunderstanding. The Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act is a Commonwealth law. It is an act of this parliament, and those provisions are decisions of this parliament. It is not a question of Territory law versus Commonwealth law. What I am saying to you is that this is the law. It is the current law of the land as enacted by this parliament. Our advice is that to try to include the same provisions in a separate bill is not advisable as it can create a set of legal complications. As I say, in a policy sense, we are in agreement, but our advice is to not accept the amendment because we think it would do damage to the intent. But the provisions you are seeking to uphold are provisions of Commonwealth law already passed by existing law agreed to by this parliament. We have an act that does that already, and we are seeking to amend another act to restate that. Our advice is that we should not do that. The policy intent is reflected in the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act, which is an act of this parliament.