Download Current Hansard 
View/Save XMLPrevious Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
-
In Committee
- Furner, Sen Mark (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Di Natale, Sen Richard
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Di Natale, Sen Richard
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Madigan, Sen John
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Division
-
In Committee
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Water
(Brown, Sen Bob, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Labor Party Leadership
(Brandis, Sen George, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Iran
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Small Business
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Broadband
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Broadband
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Gillard Government
(Ryan, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Hospitals
(Furner, Sen Mark, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Bill 2011, National Health Amendment (Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement Initiatives) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 9) Bill 2011
- Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 9) Bill 2011
- Nuclear Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2012, Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives (Medicare Levy Surcharge) Bill 2012, Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives (Medicare Levy Surcharge—Fringe Benefits) Bill 2012
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
-
Members of Parliament (Life Gold Pass) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Rhiannon, Sen Lee
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ryan, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Division
- Third Reading
-
Members of Parliament (Life Gold Pass) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Immigration Detention Centres (Question No. 673)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Mekong River (Question No. 840)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade (Question No. 928)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Staffing (Question Nos 1117 and 1131)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Attorney-General's, Home Affairs and Justice: Staffing (Question Nos 1127, 1136 and 1137 supplementary)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Travel (Question No. 1245)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Hospitality (Question No. 1246)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade (Question No. 1247)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Attorney-General's: Legal Aid (Question No. 1275 supplementary)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1308)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Native Forests: Timber Exports (Question No. 1322)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Qantas (Question No. 1323)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Qantas (Question No. 1325)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Qantas (Question No. 1328)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1422)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations and School Education, Early Childhood and Youth (Question Nos 1455 and 1456)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Housing Affordability (Question No 1458)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (Question No. 1465)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Taxation Office: Information Sharing (Question No. 1468)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1470)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
National Broadband Network (Question No. 1480)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Commonwealth South-West Marine Parks (Question No. 1488)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Naltrexone (Question No. 1492)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research (Question No. 1493)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Pontville Immigration Detention Centre (Question No. 1495)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General (Question No. 1497)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence (Question No. 1500)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Finance and Deregulation (Question No. 1501)
(Johnston, Sen David, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence (Question No. 1502)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Long Service Leave (Question No. 1504)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Sport (Question No. 1505)
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
James Price Point (Question No. 1506)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1507)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
G20 Summit (Question No. 1508)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Electoral Commission (Question No. 1510)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Special Minister of State (Question No. 1511)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence (Question No. 1514)
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Queensland Floods Recovery (Question No. 1515)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Prime Minister (Question No. 1518)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1519)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Emergency Alert Telephone Warning System (Question No. 1520)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Pontville Immigration Detention Centre (Question No. 1521)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1528)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Immigration Detention Centres (Question No. 673)
Page: 935
Immigration and Citizenship
(Question No. 1422)
Senator Cash asked the Minister representing the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, upon notice, on 4 November 2011:
(1) What was the total operating expenditure for the 2010-11 financial year.
(2) What was the increase from the 2009-10 financial year.
(3) What is the difference between the budgeted and actual expenditure for the 2010-11 financial year.
(4) With reference to the answer to question no. BE11/0012 taken on notice during the 2011-12 Budget estimates of the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, which states 'with their terms ending on 30 June 2010, 21 members did not seek reappointment, or were not reappointed for a further term', of these 21 members:
(a) how many did not seek reappointment;
(b) how many were not reappointed; and
(c) of those who were not reappointed what was the reason in each case.
(5) With reference to the answer to question no. BE11/0005 taken on notice during the 2011-12 Budget estimates of the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, which states 'fees for the period from 1 March 2011 are subject to current negotiation and have not yet been invoiced':
(a) what is the status of the of the 'current negotiation'; and
(b) has it been completed; if so, what were the fees invoiced to the Independent Protection Assessment Office for this period; if not, why not.
(6) How many additional tribunal members were appointed effective 1 July 2011.
(7) In regard to each of the following Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
(a) fewer than 5 per cent of tribunal decisions set aside by judicial review;
(b) 70 per cent of bridging visas (detention cases) decided within 7 working days;
(c) 70 per cent of RRT cases decided within 90 calendar days;
(d) 70 per cent of MRT visa cancellation or revocation cases decided within 150 calendar days;
(e) 70 per cent of MRT cases decided within 350 days;
(f) fewer than 5 complaints received per 1 000 cases; and
(g) at least 40 per cent of decisions published, can an analysis be provided of whether they were met for the 2010-11 financial year and 2011-12 financial year to date, and if a KPI was not met, why was it not met and what action has been taken.
(8) What has been the set-aside rate for the RRT and the MRT for the 2011-12 financial year to date by country of origin and visa category, and how does this compare with previous years.
(9) How many decisions have been made from 1 July 2011 to date by the RRT.
(10) How many decisions have been made from 1 July 2011 to date by the MRT.
(11) What has been the total cost of running the tribunals in the 2011-12 financial year to date.
(12) How many set aside decisions of the tribunal have been challenged by the minister in the 2011-12 financial year to date.
(13) With reference to an online article 'Immigration tribunals warn of tough times' (by Adam Gartrell on Ninemsn, 14 October 2011), in which the tribunals head Mr Denis O'Brien is quoted as saying 'Meeting the target of finalising 70 per cent of RRT cases within 90 days will be a significant challenge in 2011-12', what is the basis for this statement.
(14) What will be the cost impact of the Government's new onshore processing policy and the prediction that up to 600 irregular maritime arrivals (IMAs) may arrive per month on the tribunal's operations, and are the tribunals making provisions for the expected increased arrivals and onshore processing; if so, what are they; if not, why not.
(15) How many IMAs are currently subject to the Protection Obligation Determination (POD) process which replaced the Refugee Status Determination process used for IMAs, and of this number, how many IMAs have had their claims for protection processed by the POD process.
Senator Ludwig: The Minister for Immigration and Citizenship has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:
(1) The tribunals' total operating expenditure for the 2010-11 financial year was $46.0 million.
(2) The tribunals' operating expenditure for the 2010-11 financial year was $1.2 million higher than the $44.8 million for the 2009-10 financial year.
(3) The tribunals' budgeted total operating expenditure for the 2010-11 financial year (for finalising 8,300 cases, as per the Portfolio Budget Statements 2010-11) was $42.5 million. The tribunals' recorded an actual total operating expenditure of $46.0 million in finalising 9,181 cases.
(4) (a) Four members did not seek a further appointment.
(b) Seventeen of the 42 members who sought reappointment were not appointed for a further term.
(c) The appointments were advertised and applicants, including members seeking reappointment, were assessed against the selection criteria by a selection committee in accordance with the Australian Public Service Commission's guidelines in relation to the appointment of statutory office holders. Those applicants who were rated most highly against the selection criteria were recommended for appointment.
(5) (a) Following negotiations, a revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed between the tribunals and the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) on 9 August 2011.
(b) Under the terms of the 9 August 2011 MOU, the tribunals invoiced DIAC fees totalling $326,721 (excluding GST) for the provision of legal services and country advice services to the Independent Protection Assessment Office (IPAO) for the period 1 March 2011 to 31 August 2011.
(6) Twenty-three new tribunal members were appointed for periods of five years on 1 July 2011 comprising one senior member, 10 full-time members and 12 part-time members. In addition four full-time members were promoted to senior members.
(7) (a) The key performance indicator of fewer than 5% decisions set aside by judicial review was met in the 2010-11 financial year and 2011-12 to date. In 2010-11, 0.3% of MRT and 1.1% of RRT decisions were set aside by judicial review. In 2011-12, no decisions made have yet been set aside by judicial review.
(b) The key performance indicator of 70% bridging visas decided within seven working days from lodgment was met in the 2010-11 financial year and in 2011-12 to date. In 2010-11, 96% of bridging visas were decided within seven working days from lodgment. In 2011-12, 98% of bridging visas were decided within seven working days from lodgment.
(c) The key performance indicator of 70% of RRT cases decided within 90 calendar days from receipt of the Department's documents was met in the 2010-11 financial year, but not met in 2011-12 to date. In 2010-11, 71% of RRT cases were decided within 90 calendar days. In 2011-12 to date, 52% of RRT cases were decided within 90 calendar days.
Reasons for cases taking longer than 90 days are included in reports to the Minister prepared every four months under section 440A of the Migration Act 1958 and tabled in Parliament. The report covering 1 July to 31 October 2011 is currently being prepared. For this reporting period, factors contributing to a lower compliance rate were increased lodgments and a reduction in member capacity, with members unavailable while undertaking independent protection assessments in relation to irregular maritime arrivals.
(d) The key performance indicator of 70% of MRT visa cancellation cases decided within 150 calendar days from lodgment was not met in the 2010-11 financial year or in 2011-12 to date. In 2010-11, 60% of MRT visa cancellations were decided within 150 days from lodgment. In 2011-12 to date, 25% of MRT visa cancellations were decided within 150 days from lodgment.
The capacity to decide MRT visa cancellation cases within 150 days of lodgment has reduced as lodgments have increased and members have been unavailable while undertaking independent protection assessments in relation to irregular maritime arrivals.
(e) The key performance indicator of 70% of MRT cases decided within 350 calendar days from lodgment was not met in the 2010-11 financial year or in 2011-12 to date. In 2010-11, 55% of MRT cases were decided within 350 calendar days from lodgment. In 2011-12 to 31 October, 56% of MRT cases were decided within 350 calendar days from lodgment.
The capacity to decide MRT cases has reduced as lodgments have increased and members have been unavailable while undertaking independent protection assessments in relation to irregular maritime arrivals.
(f) The key performance indicator of fewer than five complaints received per 1,000 cases decided was met in the 2010-11 financial year and in 2011-12 to date. In both the 2010-11 and 2011-12 financial years, fewer than three complaints per 1,000 cases were received.
(g) The key performance indicator of at least 40% of decisions published was met in the 2010-11 financial year and in 2011-12 to date. In 2010-11, 43% of all decisions were published. In 2011-12 to date, 44% of all decisions were published.
(8) Between 1 July and 31 October 2011 36% of decisions have been set aside by the MRT and 26% by the RRT. By comparison, in 2010-11, 41% of MRT decisions and 24% of RRT decisions were set aside.
The following tables present the set aside rates for MRT, by visa category, and RRT, by country of origin, from 1 July to 31 October 2011 and the 2010-11 and 2009-10 financial years.
MRT SET ASIDE RATES (AND CASES SET ASIDE) BY VISA CATEGORY
|
Visa category |
2011-12 financial year to 31 October 2011 |
2010-11 financial year
|
2009-10 financial year |
|
Bridging refusal |
11% (11) |
12% (33) |
15% (23) |
|
Visitor refusal |
69% (188) |
59% (445) |
58% (393) |
|
Student refusal |
28% (167) |
36% (473) |
42% (306) |
|
Temporary business refusal |
32% (39) |
25% (87) |
30% (169) |
|
Permanent business refusal |
14% (7) |
32% (48) |
46% (127) |
|
Skilled refusal |
36% (87) |
53% (507) |
42% (793) |
|
Partner refusal |
55% (158) |
62% (579) |
66% (840) |
|
Family refusal |
49% (53) |
39% (184) |
42% (228) |
|
Student cancellation |
20% (59) |
25% (201) |
41% (333) |
|
Sponsor approval refusal |
12% (5) |
22% (28) |
21% (32) |
|
Other |
26% (32) |
32% (143) |
38% (185) |
|
TOTAL |
36% (806) |
41% (2,728) |
45% (3,429) |
RRT SET ASIDE RATES (AND CASES SET ASIDE) BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
|
|
2011-12 to 31 October 11 |
2010-11 |
2009-10 |
|||
|
Identified country |
Set aside |
% Set aside |
Set aside |
% Set aside |
Set aside |
% Set aside |
|
Afghanistan |
5 |
83% |
11 |
73% |
1 |
50% |
|
Albania |
2 |
100% |
3 |
30% |
2 |
20% |
|
Algeria |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Angola |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Argentina |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Australia |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
0 |
0% |
|
Bahrain |
0 |
0% |
2 |
100% |
1 |
25% |
|
Bangladesh |
3 |
13% |
11 |
28% |
4 |
9% |
|
Belarus |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Brazil |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Brit Dependent Terr. Citz. |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Bulgaria |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Burma (Myanmar) |
6 |
75% |
11 |
69% |
13 |
87% |
|
Cambodia |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
|
Cameroon |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
5 |
50% |
|
Canada |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Chad |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Chile |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
China (PRC) |
48 |
20% |
169 |
22% |
204 |
27% |
|
Colombia |
3 |
75% |
5 |
38% |
3 |
33% |
|
Congo, Democratic Republic of |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
4 |
80% |
|
Congo, Republic (Brazzaville) |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Cook Islands |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Czech Republic |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Denmark |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Dominican Republic |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
East Timor |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
|
Egypt |
37 |
58% |
31 |
36% |
23 |
52% |
|
El Salvador |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
|
Eritrea |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
1 |
100% |
|
Ethiopia |
2 |
100% |
6 |
55% |
14 |
74% |
|
Fiji |
9 |
15% |
42 |
13% |
19 |
15% |
|
Former Yugoslavia |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
|
Georgia |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
1 |
100% |
|
Germany |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Ghana |
1 |
33% |
0 |
0% |
4 |
33% |
|
Guinea |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Guinea-Bissau |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
|
Hungary |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
India |
6 |
11% |
13 |
7% |
10 |
6% |
|
Indonesia |
0 |
0% |
5 |
4% |
9 |
7% |
|
Iran |
14 |
78% |
39 |
76% |
16 |
80% |
|
Iraq |
8 |
73% |
26 |
93% |
6 |
55% |
|
Ireland |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Israel |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
2 |
50% |
|
Italy |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Japan |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Jordan |
0 |
0% |
3 |
23% |
8 |
57% |
|
Kazakhstan |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Kenya |
0 |
0% |
6 |
43% |
1 |
10% |
|
Kiribati |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Korea, Dem Peoples Rep of |
0 |
0% |
16 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
|
Korea, Republic Of |
0 |
0% |
6 |
18% |
2 |
6% |
|
Kuwait |
0 |
0% |
4 |
67% |
0 |
0% |
|
Laos, Peoples Democratic Rep |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Latvia |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Lebanon |
11 |
33% |
29 |
31% |
21 |
26% |
|
Liberia |
0 |
0% |
3 |
75% |
0 |
0% |
|
Libya |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
|
Lithuania |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Macedonia, Fmr Yugo Rep of |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Malawi |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Malaysia |
0 |
0% |
3 |
2% |
6 |
3% |
|
Mauritius |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Mongolia |
1 |
25% |
1 |
10% |
1 |
17% |
|
Montenegro |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Morocco |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
|
Nepal |
3 |
8% |
10 |
16% |
7 |
33% |
|
New Zealand |
0 |
0% |
1 |
17% |
0 |
0% |
|
Nigeria |
0 |
0% |
5 |
36% |
5 |
29% |
|
Other |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Pakistan |
10 |
33% |
21 |
36% |
22 |
43% |
|
Palestinian Terr. (W.Bank/Gaza) |
4 |
80% |
3 |
75% |
3 |
75% |
|
Papua New Guinea |
0 |
0% |
1 |
14% |
1 |
14% |
|
Peru |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Philippines |
2 |
15% |
3 |
9% |
2 |
6% |
|
Poland |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Qatar |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Romania |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Russian Federation |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
|
Rwanda |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
5 |
83% |
|
Samoa |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
|
Saudi Arabia |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Senegal |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Serbia |
1 |
100% |
1 |
50% |
0 |
0% |
|
Sierra Leone |
2 |
100% |
1 |
14% |
1 |
50% |
|
Singapore |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Solomon Islands |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Somalia |
0 |
0% |
1 |
50% |
4 |
80% |
|
South Africa |
0 |
0% |
3 |
27% |
2 |
22% |
|
Sri Lanka |
5 |
26% |
33 |
59% |
22 |
32% |
|
Stateless |
0 |
0% |
3 |
33% |
0 |
0% |
|
Sudan |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
3 |
100% |
|
Syria |
3 |
100% |
4 |
40% |
2 |
67% |
|
Taiwan |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Tanzania |
0 |
0% |
2 |
40% |
1 |
100% |
|
Thailand |
0 |
0% |
1 |
7% |
0 |
0% |
|
Togo |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0 |
1 |
100% |
|
Tonga |
0 |
0% |
1 |
6% |
0 |
0% |
|
Tunisia |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Turkey |
5 |
38% |
21 |
72% |
9 |
45% |
|
Uganda |
1 |
100% |
2 |
67% |
1 |
50% |
|
Ukraine |
0 |
0% |
1 |
17% |
1 |
20% |
|
United Arab Emirates |
1 |
50% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
United Kingdom |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
United States of America |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Uzbekistan |
1 |
100% |
5 |
63% |
1 |
50% |
|
Vanuatu |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
|
Venezuela |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
Vietnam |
3 |
18% |
1 |
3% |
1 |
5% |
|
Zambia |
0 |
0% |
1 |
100% |
0 |
0% |
|
Zimbabwe |
10 |
59% |
47 |
61% |
32 |
58% |
|
Total |
211 |
26% |
626 |
24% |
514 |
24% |
(9) Between 1 July and 31 October 2011, 816 cases were decided by the RRT.
(10) Between 1 July and 31 October 2011, 2,227 cases were decided by the MRT.
(11) The tribunals' total operating expenditure for the 2011-12 financial year to 31 October was $16.5 million.
(12) No tribunal decisions have been challenged by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship in the courts in the 2011-12 financial year to 31 October 2011.
(13) The tribunals have experienced large increases in lodgments over the last two years and member capacity has reduced through members who are working as independent protection assessors for the IPAO.
Since 2008-09, lodgments to the MRT and RRT have increased by 33%, rising from 9,960 to 13,281 in 2010-11. Although the tribunals' membership was recently boosted by the appointment of 23 new members to a total of 112 members, 20 members are currently appointed as independent protection assessors, and the tribunals operated for much of 2010-11 with 81 active members. These factors resulted in the tribunals' on-hand caseload almost doubling since 2009, with the number of cases on hand increasing from 6,919 on 1 July 2009 to 13,726 at 31 October 2011.
(14) Funding adjustments are currently being considered and negotiated with the Department of Finance and Deregulation. Updated expense estimates will be provided as part of the 2011-12 Additional Estimates process.
(15) As at 20 November 2011, 3,399 people had been screened into the POD process, with the RSA process continuing in parallel for those people already in that process. Of these, 817 people had been granted a Protection visa and 474 people referred for independent merits review.