

- Title
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Mekong River (Question No. 840)
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
27-02-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
916
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
840
- Questioner
Rhiannon, Sen Lee
- Responder
Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Speaker
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/aa88dae2-44ba-4705-833a-d8b10600a4d0/0259
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
-
In Committee
- Furner, Sen Mark (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Di Natale, Sen Richard
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Di Natale, Sen Richard
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Madigan, Sen John
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Division
-
In Committee
-
National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Water
(Brown, Sen Bob, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Labor Party Leadership
(Brandis, Sen George, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Iran
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Small Business
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Broadband
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Broadband
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Gillard Government
(Ryan, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Hospitals
(Furner, Sen Mark, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Access to Justice (Federal Jurisdiction) Amendment Bill 2011, National Health Amendment (Fifth Community Pharmacy Agreement Initiatives) Bill 2012, Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 9) Bill 2011
- Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 9) Bill 2011
- Nuclear Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives Bill 2012, Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives (Medicare Levy Surcharge) Bill 2012, Fairer Private Health Insurance Incentives (Medicare Levy Surcharge—Fringe Benefits) Bill 2012
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
-
Members of Parliament (Life Gold Pass) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Rhiannon, Sen Lee
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Ryan, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Division
- Third Reading
-
Members of Parliament (Life Gold Pass) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Immigration Detention Centres (Question No. 673)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Mekong River (Question No. 840)
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade (Question No. 928)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Staffing (Question Nos 1117 and 1131)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Attorney-General's, Home Affairs and Justice: Staffing (Question Nos 1127, 1136 and 1137 supplementary)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Travel (Question No. 1245)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Hospitality (Question No. 1246)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade (Question No. 1247)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Attorney-General's: Legal Aid (Question No. 1275 supplementary)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1308)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Native Forests: Timber Exports (Question No. 1322)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Qantas (Question No. 1323)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Qantas (Question No. 1325)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Qantas (Question No. 1328)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1422)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Employment and Workplace Relations and School Education, Early Childhood and Youth (Question Nos 1455 and 1456)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Housing Affordability (Question No 1458)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (Question No. 1465)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Taxation Office: Information Sharing (Question No. 1468)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1470)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
National Broadband Network (Question No. 1480)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Commonwealth South-West Marine Parks (Question No. 1488)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Naltrexone (Question No. 1492)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research (Question No. 1493)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Pontville Immigration Detention Centre (Question No. 1495)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General (Question No. 1497)
(Boyce, Sen Sue, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence (Question No. 1500)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Finance and Deregulation (Question No. 1501)
(Johnston, Sen David, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence (Question No. 1502)
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Long Service Leave (Question No. 1504)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Sport (Question No. 1505)
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
James Price Point (Question No. 1506)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1507)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
G20 Summit (Question No. 1508)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Electoral Commission (Question No. 1510)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Special Minister of State (Question No. 1511)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Defence (Question No. 1514)
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Queensland Floods Recovery (Question No. 1515)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Prime Minister (Question No. 1518)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1519)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Emergency Alert Telephone Warning System (Question No. 1520)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Pontville Immigration Detention Centre (Question No. 1521)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1528)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Immigration Detention Centres (Question No. 673)
Page: 916
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Mekong River
(Question No. 840)
Senator Rhiannon asked the Minister representing the Minister for Foreign Affairs, upon notice, on 21 July 2011:
In regard to Lao People ' s Democratic Republic ' s (Laos ' ) proposed Xayaburi Dam on the mainstream of the Mekong River, Australia ' s support to the Mekong River Commission (MRC), and Australia ' s bilateral aid to Mekong countries bordering the Mekong River:
(1) As a major donor to the MRC, and for the MRCs Procedures for Notification, Prior Consultation and Agreement under the 1955 Mekong Agreement (PNPCA), what position does the Australian Government hold on the proposed Xayaburi Dam, and the other proposed mainstream dams on the Mekong River.
(2) What is the Australian Government ' s understanding of the current status of the PNPCA.
(3) Does the Australian Government consider that obligations under the procedures have been met, and whether they are completed or still ongoing .
(4) What messages will Australia be sending to the Mekong governments in the lead up to the proposed ministerial meeting to discuss the Xayaburi Dam .
(5) Given that the Vietnam and Cambodian Governments have made clear public statements regarding their concerns with the Xayaburi Dam, including support for the recommended 10 year moratorium on the dams, how will Australia support these countries ' clearly stated public views on the Xayaburi Dam and the PNPCA.
(6) Will the Minister, or an Australian Government representative, meet bilaterally with the Lao Government to encourage a renewed commitment by Laos to international dialogue and decision making, via regionally mandated processes, for the Xayaburi Dam; if so, what messages will the Australian Government give to the Lao Government.
(7) Given Australia ' s previous influential role in Development Partner considerations of the proposed dams, will the Australian Government join with other governments such as Vietnam and the United States of America, in publicly supporting the recommendations of the Strategic Environmental Assessment and call for a 10 year moratorium on decisions regarding the Mekong mainstream dams.
Senator Conroy: The Minister for Foreign Affairs has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:
(1) The Australian Government regards the development and use of the waters of the Mekong River Basin as sovereign decisions for Mekong governments. However the Australian Government is concerned that deliberation processes about Mekong water resources development are transparent, well-informed and inclusive, as the livelihoods of millions of people may be affected. The Australian Government's technical support provided under the Australian Mekong Water Resources Program and policy advocacy about the Procedures for Notification, Prior Consultation and Agreement (PNPCA) process supports this ambition.
(2) The MRC met at ministerial level in Siem Reap, Cambodia from 7-9 December 2011 to further discuss the proposed Xayaburi Hydropower Dam proposal. There was no direct statement on the Xayaburi Hydropower Dam issued at that meeting. Member countries agreed to conduct further studies on the sustainable development and management of the Mekong River, including the impacts of mainstream hydropower development projects. The MRC has not officially announced that the formal Xayaburi Hydropower Dam deliberation process has completed.
(3) The Australian Government notes the status of the formal Xayaburi Hydropower Dam deliberation process is uncertain. The Australian Government, and other MRC development partners, consider that there are many key remaining knowledge gaps about the potential impact of Xayaburi Hydropower Dam proposal and other Mekong mainstream dam proposals. The potential impact of the Xayaburi Hydropower dam proposal, and others like it, on fisheries and sediment flows are areas that in particular warrant further research. Therefore Australia and other MRC development partners have urged (through a range of fora that includes the MRC), that the results of research work into these issues needs to be made available and discussed with all relevant stakeholders before any Lower Mekong mainstream dam proposal proceeds to construction, including the Xayaburi Hydropower Dam.
(4) Australia took the lead in formulating a joint MRC development partner statement, which addressed the dam, delivered to the 7-9 December 2011 MRC Council meeting. In this statement donors welcomed the decision reached at the Council meeting to conduct further studies on the sustainable development and management of the Mekong River, including the impacts of mainstream hydropower development projects. The statement noted that the study should draw upon the best of international scientific, social and economic advice and holistic consultation processes and that MRC development partners would assist the MRC to ensure this was realized. The statement urged that the results of the research work needed to be available and discussed before any Lower Mekong mainstream dam proposal proceeds to construction, including the Xayaburi Hydropower Dam.
(5) The Australian Government will continue to engage with all MRC Member States in support of dam deliberation processes that are well-informed, transparent and allow for contestability. The Australian Government's aim is to support, and advocate for, robust deliberative processes in the countries and communities most affected. The Australian Government wants to ensure the benefits and costs are fully considered, and that as a result, informed decisions are taken by the governments of the Mekong basin countries. The Australian Government's support for, and engagement with, the MRC and its Member States supports these objectives.
(6) Australia's Ambassador to Laos has raised the Xayaburi Hydropower dam on several occasions with senior members of the Government of Laos. These have included the Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and Head of the Water Resources and Environment Administration, the Minister for Planning and Investment, and the Minister for Natural Resources and Environment. During these meetings Australia advocated for a transparent and well informed Xayaburi hydropower dam deliberation process that would allow for meaningful discussions by all interested stakeholders. Australia and other donors have continued to call for this through the Joint MRC development partner statement to the December 2011 MRC Council meeting.
(7) The Australian Government has not called for a 10 year moratorium of Mekong mainstream dam construction. The Australian Government judges it would be more productive to continue to engage with MRC Member States in support of dam deliberation processes that are well-informed, transparent and allow for contestability. The Australian Government's aim is to support, and advocate for, robust deliberative processes in the countries and communities most affected. The Australian Government wants to ensure the benefits and costs are fully considered, and that as a result, informed decisions are taken by the sovereign nations of the Mekong basin.