

- Title
MOTIONS
James Price Point
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
18-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4812
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stage
- Type
- Context
MOTIONS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/9ad85bef-6cdf-4332-894f-15d4be804a7b/0064
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Australian Energy Market Amendment (National Energy Retail Law) Bill 2011, Competition and Consumer Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2011, Competition and Consumer Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 6) Bill 2011
- Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (National Regulator) Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum (Royalty) Amendment Bill 2011
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
- Indigenous Education (Targeted Assistance) Amendment Bill 2011
- Statute Stocktake Bill (No. 1) 2011
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Division
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
-
In Committee
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Ryan, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Education and Health Funding
(Gallacher, Sen Alex, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Asylum Seekers
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Carbon Pricing
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Carbon Pricing
(McKenzie, Sen Bridget, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Apple Imports
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Carbon Pricing
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- FIRST SPEECH
- PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Defence: Naval Vessels (Question No. 483)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Reserves and Contractors (Question No. 509)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Child Minding Expenses (Question No. 519)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 520)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Hospitality (Question No. 521)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Hospitality (Question No. 531)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Gifts Policy (Question No. 574)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Afghanistan: Depleted Uranium Munitions (Question No. 577)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Attorney-General: Staffing (Question No. 625)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 634)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 713)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 730)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 731)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 732)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 733)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 734)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 790)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Australian Water Licences (Question No. 834)
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Defence: Aircraft (Question No. 838)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Defence: Naval Vessels (Question No. 483)
Page: 4812
Senator SIEWERT (Western Australia—Australian Greens Whip) (12:22): I seek leave to make a short statement.
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Leave is granted for two minutes.
Senator SIEWERT: The point here is that they have not been following proper process. The government decided that this should be assessed as an uncontrolled action. It should never have been decided to assess it as an uncontrolled action. There are bilbies there. We know there are bilbies there—one adult and three babies. We know they are there, and by refusing to issue a stop-work order the government are saying that it is okay to clear the habitat of a national icon endangered species. That is what the government are saying. They are going ahead and allowing clearing to happen before this project has completed its strategic assessment, before the government have made their decision on heritage listing and before this project has had any environmental assessment. How is that proper procedure, may I ask? It isn't. It is not proper assessment.
There are plenty of alternatives for this project. There are plenty of other places where this project could be put. But no, the government of Western Australia and, it appears, the federal government and Woodside are determined for this project to go on land that has extreme heritage value and high environmental values. This is not carrying out proper process. If the government were concerned about proper process, it would in fact issue a stop-work order, require this area to be assessed and actually assess the information that the community has collected around the existence of bilbies. The government is saying that it is okay to trash the habitat of another endangered species in this country, and the community is saying that is not acceptable.
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Before I put the question, I remind senators of the Procedure Committee report that indicated that this is not the time to be debating. I remind all parties that this is not the time to be making statements; it is the time to determine motions in the manner that we have been doing.
Question put.
The Senate divided. [12:26]
(The Deputy PRESIDENT—Senator Parry)
Question negatived.