

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
Government Advertising, Carbon Pricing
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
09-02-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
587
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Thistlethwaite, Sen Matt
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/74079063-a09a-4d4d-8a22-b1fee5f99025/0179
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency Bill 2011, Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Service Reform) Bill 2011, Telecommunications (Industry Levy) Bill 2011
- Members of Parliament (Life Gold Pass) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Significant Incident Directions) Bill 2011
- Customs Amendment (New Zealand Rules of Origin) Bill 2011
- Higher Education Support Amendment (VET FEE-HELP and Other Measures) Bill 2011 [2012]
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Broadband
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Aged Care
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Broadband
(Madigan, Sen John, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Ministerial Arrangements
(Colbeck, Sen Richard) -
Broadband
(Madigan, Sen John, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Ministerial Arrangements
(Colbeck, Sen Richard)
-
Broadband
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- BUDGET
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Infrastructure and Transport: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question No. 1052)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Question No. 1243)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Men's Shed Association (Question Nos 1299 and 1300)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Association of Building Sustainability Assessors (Question No. 1301)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1309)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Treasury (Question No. 1317)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
James Price Point (Question No. 1426)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1428)
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Health and Ageing (Question No. 1429)
(Bushby, Sen David, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1430)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Curtin Detention Centre (Question No. 1432)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1433)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Crisis Coordination Centre (Question No. 1435)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements (Question No. 1436)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1437)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Emergency Management Australia (Question No. 1438)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1439)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Projects of Concern (Question No. 1440)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Early Indicators and Warning System (Question No. 1441)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1442)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1443)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1444)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 1445)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Projects (Question No. 1446)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Air Warfare Destroyer Program (Question No. 1447)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1448)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 1449)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1450)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Program Funding (Question No. 1451)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Program Funding (Question No. 1452)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Projects (Question No. 1453)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1454)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation (Question No. 1457)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Christmas Island Detention Centre (Question Nos 1461 and 1462)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1464)
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Afghanistan (Question No. 1466)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Olympic Dam (Question No. 1467)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Taxation (Question No. 1469)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
National Heritage List (Question No. 1471)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government: Travel Allowance (Question No. 1472)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1473)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1474)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1475)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1476)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1477)
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Firearms (Question No. 1478)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Centrelink (Question No. 1481)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1482)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Assange, Mr Julian (Question No. 1483)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Bureau of Meteorology (Question No. 1484)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Treasury (Question No. 1485)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1486)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Prime Minister (Question No. 1487)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Marine Sanctuaries (Question No. 1489)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment and Workplace Relations: Staffing (Question No. 1490)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Employment and Workplace Relations: Staffing (Question No. 1491)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Marine Bioregional Planning Program (Question No. 1494)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Medicare Locals (Question No. 1509)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Infrastructure and Transport: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question No. 1052)
Page: 587
Senator THISTLETHWAITE (New South Wales) (15:28): When Labor came to office in 2007 we promised the Australian people that we would restore confidence to government advertising in this country. We pledged that government campaigns would be properly and independently reviewed, properly targeted, nonpolitical with the intention of informing the community about government policies and programs. We have delivered on that commitment. The proof is in the administration of government advertiĀsing arrangements audit process. It proves that we have delivered on this commitment. But the question must be asked: why did Labor have to pledge this to the Australian people in the lead-up to the 2007 election? Why was this reform of government advertising and oversight required here in Australia? The answer is quite simple: because the Australian public had lost confidence in government advertising during the years of the Howard government. For proof of that we need look no further than the government advertising associated with the goods and services tax campaign and, particularly, the Howard government's shonky advertising associated with Work Choices, a $55 million waste of taxpayers' money. It was blatantly party political advertising used to soften up the public regarding the harshest elements of the total realisation of Work Choices.
Not only was this advertising associated with Work Choices blatantly party political; it was also wrong. Some of the information contained in those ads was completely wrong. There is no greater example of that than the fact that the ads associated with Australian workplace agreements claimed that workers could move onto Australian workplace agreements where they received 'fair' compensation from their employer. Having dealt with a number of Australian workplace agreements I can tell you, Mr Deputy President, that the compensation was not fair at all. In fact, in many respects there was no compensation for forcing young workers in particular onto agreements that stripped away weekend penalty rates, shift allowances and other important leave entitlements. But those ads also claimed that if people had questions about moving onto Australian workplace agreements they could seek advice from an organisation called the 'workplace authority'. Everyone scratched their head and thought: what on earth is the workplace authority? Then it was discovered that there was no workplace authority at all and that the closest thing may have been the Office of the Employment Advocate.
But the greatest example of the Howard government's failure with respect to the Work Choices advertising campaign came in early August 2007, when the Howard government was actually forced to withdraw their own government advertising. Why? Because an actor who was playing a 'concerned father', concerned in this ad about the fact that his two sons might be forced onto Australian workplace agreements that cut conditions, had been accused by two young workers who had worked for him in his painting business of ripping them off. Life writ large in a Howard government ad! It said everything about Work Choices. Is there any wonder why that particular ad was withdrawn?
The government welcomes the ANAO report on its Clean Energy Future package. The report was tabled in parliament and it suggests that the government's transparency and accountability framework for campaign advertising is operating well. Again, we made the promise and we have delivered on that promise. The report finds:
Additional Treasury evidence supported the statement that more than 9 in 10 households (92 per cent) were estimated to receive some combination of assistance, lending support to the statement in the household mail-out.
That is, lending support to the statement that this household mail-out was true. The report also says:
The campaign did not contain any overt promotion of party political interests, party slogans or bias …
It is an independent report verifying that the government system of advertising is working. (Time expired)