

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
Government Advertising, Carbon Pricing
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
09-02-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
584
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Mason, Sen Brett
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/74079063-a09a-4d4d-8a22-b1fee5f99025/0176
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BILLS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency Bill 2011, Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Service Reform) Bill 2011, Telecommunications (Industry Levy) Bill 2011
- Members of Parliament (Life Gold Pass) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2012
- Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (Significant Incident Directions) Bill 2011
- Customs Amendment (New Zealand Rules of Origin) Bill 2011
- Higher Education Support Amendment (VET FEE-HELP and Other Measures) Bill 2011 [2012]
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Broadband
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Aged Care
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Broadband
(Madigan, Sen John, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Ministerial Arrangements
(Colbeck, Sen Richard) -
Broadband
(Madigan, Sen John, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Ministerial Arrangements
(Colbeck, Sen Richard)
-
Broadband
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- BUDGET
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- MOTIONS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Infrastructure and Transport: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question No. 1052)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (Question No. 1243)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian Men's Shed Association (Question Nos 1299 and 1300)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Association of Building Sustainability Assessors (Question No. 1301)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Employment and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1309)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Treasury (Question No. 1317)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
James Price Point (Question No. 1426)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1428)
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Health and Ageing (Question No. 1429)
(Bushby, Sen David, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Immigration and Citizenship (Question No. 1430)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Curtin Detention Centre (Question No. 1432)
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1433)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Crisis Coordination Centre (Question No. 1435)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements (Question No. 1436)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1437)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Emergency Management Australia (Question No. 1438)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1439)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Projects of Concern (Question No. 1440)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Early Indicators and Warning System (Question No. 1441)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1442)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Strategic Reform Program (Question No. 1443)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1444)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 1445)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Projects (Question No. 1446)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Air Warfare Destroyer Program (Question No. 1447)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1448)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 1449)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1450)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Program Funding (Question No. 1451)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Program Funding (Question No. 1452)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Projects (Question No. 1453)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 1454)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Export Finance and Insurance Corporation (Question No. 1457)
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Christmas Island Detention Centre (Question Nos 1461 and 1462)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1464)
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Afghanistan (Question No. 1466)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Olympic Dam (Question No. 1467)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Taxation (Question No. 1469)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
National Heritage List (Question No. 1471)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government: Travel Allowance (Question No. 1472)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1473)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1474)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1475)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Australian Defence Force (Question No. 1476)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (Question No. 1477)
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Firearms (Question No. 1478)
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Centrelink (Question No. 1481)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Attorney-General's (Question No. 1482)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Assange, Mr Julian (Question No. 1483)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Bureau of Meteorology (Question No. 1484)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Treasury (Question No. 1485)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1486)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Prime Minister (Question No. 1487)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Marine Sanctuaries (Question No. 1489)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Employment and Workplace Relations: Staffing (Question No. 1490)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Employment and Workplace Relations: Staffing (Question No. 1491)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Marine Bioregional Planning Program (Question No. 1494)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Medicare Locals (Question No. 1509)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Infrastructure and Transport: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question No. 1052)
Page: 584
Senator MASON (Queensland) (15:13): I move:
That the Senate take note of the answers given by the Minister for Finance and Deregulation (Senator Wong) to questions without notice asked by Senators Brandis and Birmingham today relating to the carbon tax.
Surprise, surprise, shock horror! In trying to sell their great, big, new carbon tax to an unsuspecting and unwilling public, the government has failed to comply with its own financial management regulations. Do you believe that, Mr Deputy President? Well, they have. I understand that in one particular case tenders were open for 1½ hours. It does not sound to me like the Prime Minister's much lauded, 'Let the sun shine in,' and, 'Accountability is the foremost goal of this government,' assurances have been met. Not a very good start, I would say.
The Auditor-General also found that the campaign has not been very effective. There would not be anyone in our nation who is surprised to hear that. It is like trying to sell a dog's breakfast, yet it is a dog's breakfast that the Prime Minister said would never be served up to the Australian public, and it has not been successful.
Apparently, as the newspapers tell us, the campaign thus far has cost about $20 million and there is about another $10 million to spend. As you know, Mr Deputy President, I like to be helpful. I suspect it might assist the government not to spend the final $10 million and instead to put it into trying to pay off the budget deficit. That is what I would be doing with the extra $10 million. Of course, none of this money—the $20 million or the $10 million following—comes anywhere near the cost to this country of the most expensive carbon tax in the world. The government's carbon tax will raise $7.7 billion in the first year, and that is at $23 per tonne of carbon. But, by 2014-15, it will cost $9.2 billion a year.
What do Labor love? Labour love three things: they love taxing, they love debt and they love the churn. You have heard me on debt before, Mr Deputy President. There has not been one federal Labor government since 1901 that has left government with more money in the kitty than there was when they came in. Since 1901, they have always put Australia further into debt. So Labor love taxing, they love debt and they love the churn. These are the three steps to social democracy. But social democracy has failed in western Europe, and it will fail in Australia.
Many mischievous arguments have been put in favour of the carbon tax. Perhaps the most mischievous—and the most pathetic—argument, which has been put by too many people in the Labor Party, including the minister and the Prime Minister, is this: irrespective of whether other countries introduce a price on carbon, it is in Australia's interest to have one. I say that again—this lot says that, irrespective of whether any other country on earth has a carbon tax, it is in our interest to have one. Who in this country except this lot believes that absolute rubbish? They believe that, even if no other country on earth prices carbon, it is in our interest to pay more money for energy and for our cost of living to go up. If it were such a sterling idea, don't you think that some other nation would have come up with this brilliant brainwave? They would all be running to do it before us. The United States, Canada, Brazil, Russia, India and China would all be running to do it before us; yet not one of them has done so. That is because they know that moving first in the world on carbon is a mistake. It is a mistake because it is against their national interest, just as it is against our national interest.
The greatest disgrace of this government is this: they want to be heroes overseas—to look good at the UN and elsewhere—and they are quite prepared to sell out Australia's national interest to do so. That makes me sick.