

- Title
DOCUMENTS
Forestry
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
13-09-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
5952
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Stage
- Type
- Context
DOCUMENTS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/5b24bb76-55c2-4688-8430-e6687ef5a346/0166
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- NOTICES
-
BILLS
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Fibre Deployment) Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Parry, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Procedural Text
-
In Committee
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Fibre Deployment) Bill 2011
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Parliamentary Budget Office
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Brandis, Sen George, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tarkine Wilderness
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Carbon Pricing
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Mining
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Asylum Seekers
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Western Australian Offshore Constitutional Settlement
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Asylum Seekers
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) - QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS, Carbon Pricing
- Western Australian Offshore Constitutional Settlement
-
Gillard Government
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
-
COMMITTEES
- Public Accounts and Audit Committee
-
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Fibre Deployment) Bill 2011
- Back, Sen Chris
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Division
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Third Reading
- DOCUMENTS
- STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
-
ADJOURNMENT
- Hogg, Sen John
- Australian Women's Land Army
- Australian Manufacturing
- Human Trafficking
- Nippon Paper Group, Bushfires
- Desalination in Western Australia
- Regional Development Australia Fund
- National Child Protection Week
- Learn Earn Legend
- Illawarra Local Government Elections
- Uranium Mining
- Asia-Pacific Region
- South Australia: Catholic Church
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Housing Supply and Affordability Reform (Question No. 593)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Mining Projects (Question No. 723)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Macquarie Island: Baiting Program (Question No. 832)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Job Services Australia: Providers (Question No. 899)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Member for Dobell (Question No. 905)
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Water Policy (Question No. 919)
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (Question No. 983)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Inspector General of Taxation (Question No. 995)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Inspector General of Taxation (Question No. 1001)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet: Media Staffing (Question No. 1028)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Housing Supply and Affordability Reform (Question No. 593)
Page: 5952
Senator IAN MACDONALD (Queensland) (18:58): by leave—Once upon a time Australia was self-sufficient in timber and in forests. Nowadays we import a lot of our sawlogs. Much of them come from places around the world which have a very poor environmental record. The fact that a once-vibrant timber industry now no longer practically exists in Australia is thanks very much to the Greens political party. I had the honour for several years to be Australia's minister for forestry and I noticed then that Senator Bob Brown made his mark on society basically opposing logging of the Tasmanian forests. Mr Acting Deputy President, there are so many native forest trees in Tasmania, that if you started cutting them down today, you would not finish by the time anyone who is currently in this Senate would still be alive. There are enormous forests in Tasmania that are native old growth forests. Many of them are protected, because over the years the logging industry built fire breaks and tracks through the forest to ensure that any forest fires, which are the greatest cause of destruction of native forests in Australia, were easily accessed. Because the forest industry had a financial interest in the forests and because they were concerned about the destruction of these valuable assets for Australia, more often than not those fires were extinguished in a relatively short period of time.
Tasmania had an industry which it could be proud of. Many, many thousands of workers and their families depended upon the forest industry for their livelihood. Yet the Greens political party for no more than a political reason has opposed logging in Tasmania for decades, to the extent, as Senate Colbeck mentioned, where the forces of sense and support for workers and the industry in Tasmania have been giving ground at the behest of the Greens over many decades.
In 2004, after three years of working with the CFMEU, the Howard government came to an arrangement which was intended to be the finish of fights over the Tasmanian forests. We locked up a lot more forests in native reserves. We put a lot of money into it, which this motion vaguely relates to. We had agreement with the unions and agreeĀment with the Tasmanian Labor government. It was almost a 'peace in our time' arrangement. John Howard appeared before workers in Tasmania—and members of the Labor Party will well remember this—to the adoration of the blue-collar workers, the hard-hat people, who cheered and applauded the Howard government's approach and its decisions in relation to Tasmanian forestry.
Senator Polley interjecting—
Senator IAN MACDONALD: I hear Senator Polley interjecting. I cannot hear what she is saying but I am sure she is agreeing with me, because, at the time, the Tasmanian state Labor government—not the federal Labor government that was under Latham—the federal Liberal government and the CFMEU were all in total support. We had won a major victory for Tasmania, for the forest industries and for conservation. But the Greens never give up; they never give up. They will keep going until they destroy the forest industries right throughout Australia. They have almost succeeded and they will continue—not, I might say, for any conservation reason, because the forests are conserved and preserved and never to be in any other way. But there was a logging industry, there was work and there were manufacturing industries in Tasmania. The Greens were beaten at one stage but they have come back. They will not stop—mark my words—until the industry is fully destroyed.
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT ( Senator Mark Bishop ): Order! Senator Macdonald, your time has expired.
Senator IAN MACDONALD: I seek leave to continue my remarks later.
Leave granted.