Permalink
Prev
Next
Return to results list



- Title
BILLS
Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
21-11-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
8982
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/4df8ca1e-91e8-412c-81fc-513013097de9/0091
Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Table Of Contents
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
-
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Third Reading
- Business Names Registration (Application of Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011
-
Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Third Reading
-
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Afghanistan
(Brown, Sen Bob, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Mining
(Brown, Sen Carol, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Asylum Seekers
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Mining
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Carbon Pricing
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1018)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Asylum Seekers (Question No. 1206)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1213)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (Question No. 1216)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1241)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1242)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1267)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Human Services (Question No. 1272)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (Question No. 1274)
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Fair Work Ombudsman (Question No. 1310)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1018)
Content Window
Monday, 21 November 2011
Page: 8982
Page: 8982
Senator SIEWERT (Western Australia—Australian Greens Whip) (13:42): I want to change tack for a moment. I want to raise the issue of intellectual impairment versus cognitive impairment. Has the government put some thought into that? When the government undertakes the review in 18 months, is it an issue that can be picked up?