

- Title
BILLS
Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
21-11-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
8981
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/4df8ca1e-91e8-412c-81fc-513013097de9/0089
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
-
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Third Reading
- Business Names Registration (Application of Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011
-
Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Third Reading
-
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Afghanistan
(Brown, Sen Bob, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Mining
(Brown, Sen Carol, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Asylum Seekers
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Mining
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Carbon Pricing
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1018)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Asylum Seekers (Question No. 1206)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1213)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (Question No. 1216)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1241)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1242)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1267)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Human Services (Question No. 1272)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (Question No. 1274)
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Fair Work Ombudsman (Question No. 1310)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1018)
Page: 8981
Senator SIEWERT (Western Australia—Australian Greens Whip) (13:38): I do not accept your point but I understand it. But a number of decisions that this government has made will make it harder for people to get the disability support pension. More people are now subject to participation requireÂments. More people will not have the required number of points through the impairment tables. While I understand the point that you are making, I do not accept it, because there are going to be an increasing number of people subject to participation requirements and who are going to be disadvantaged because they live in regional and rural areas that do not have access to good public transport. They will find it harder to meet their participation requirements.
I am aware that a mobility allowance is provided and that there are various state programs. This is not adequate. People living with disability have told us that this sort of support is not adequate. The public transport systems in these areas are not adequate. We know that there are a number of people living in regional areas and areas fringing metropolitan areas because it is cheaper to live in those places. We know that that is the case and yet there are going to be an increasing number of people disadvantaged by this. That is why I asked the question. I know that we are talking specifically about the implementation of impairment tables. But that begs this question: when will you look at the cumulative impact on people living with disability of all the decisions being made by government?