

- Title
BILLS
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
21-11-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
8960
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/4df8ca1e-91e8-412c-81fc-513013097de9/0035
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
-
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Third Reading
- Business Names Registration (Application of Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011
-
Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Third Reading
-
Social Security Legislation Amendment (Family Participation Measures) Bill 2011
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Afghanistan
(Brown, Sen Bob, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Mining
(Brown, Sen Carol, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Asylum Seekers
(Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Mining
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Carbon Pricing
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- BILLS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1018)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Asylum Seekers (Question No. 1206)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1213)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (Question No. 1216)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1241)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1242)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1267)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Human Services (Question No. 1272)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (Question No. 1274)
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Fair Work Ombudsman (Question No. 1310)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 1018)
Page: 8960
Senator BERNARDI (South Australia) (11:58): Thank you, Minister. I hear your words and I understand you have accepted some advice in respect of this but I have grave concerns that they are platitudes; they are just about implementing a pilot program that is going to be neither effective nor efficient.
That brings me to another question in respect of the suspension of income support payments where parents fail to attend appointments with Centrelink without a reasonable excuse or fail to sign an employment pathway form. I understand that, as part of this, when parents comply with the employment pathway plan after having had a failure they get full repayment of their benefits. But let us imagine a scenario in which a parent fails to comply for a period of weeks and thus has no income support coming through. Has the government considered the impact it would have on the child who is in the care of the parent if possibly the only form of income for supporting and sustaining the child were suspended?