

- Title
COMMITTEES
Scrutiny of New Taxes Committee
Report
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
13-10-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
Colbeck, Sen Richard
Brown, Sen Bob
Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Page
7454
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
McEwen, Sen Anne
- Stage
- Type
- Context
COMMITTEES
- System Id
chamber/hansards/44a5a46d-a92f-4e32-9264-5bdc1e61282a/0270
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- MOTIONS
-
BILLS
- Clean Energy Bill 2011, Clean Energy (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Clean Energy (Household Assistance Amendments) Bill 2011, Clean Energy (Income Tax Rates Amendments) Bill 2011, Clean Energy (Tax Laws Amendments) Bill 2011, Clean Energy Regulator Bill 2011
- Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Bill 2011
- Auditor-General Amendment Bill 2011
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
-
BILLS
- Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 6) Bill 2011
- Banking Amendment (Covered Bonds) Bill 2011
- Customs Amendment (Anti-dumping Measures) Bill 2011, Customs Amendment (Anti-dumping Improvements) Bill 2011
- Business Names Registration Bill 2011, Business Names Registration (Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Bill 2011, Business Names Registration (Fees) Bill 2011
- National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Amendment Bill 2011
- Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 2) 2011
- STATEMENTS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Dementia
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Defence Force: Fuel and Carbon Costs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Farming Initiative
(Gallacher, Sen Alex, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Clean Energy Finance Corporation
(McKenzie, Sen Bridget, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Airports
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Asylum Seekers
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Prime Minister's Prizes for Science
(Brown, Sen Carol, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Carbon Pricing
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- STATEMENTS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
-
DOCUMENTS
- Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
- Apple Imports
- Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority, Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, Department of Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government, Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Portfolio
- Department of Health and Ageing
- Natural Heritage Trust of Australia
- Commonwealth Grants Commission
- DOCUMENTS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Defence (Question Nos 503 and 779)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 504)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 633)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 637)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 638)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 639)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 640)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 641)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 642)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 643)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 644)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 645)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 646)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence: Submarines (Question No. 647)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Department of Parliamentary Services (Question No. 682 supplementary)
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hogg, Sen John) -
Defence (Question No. 714)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Defence (Question No. 780)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
First Home Saver Accounts (Question No. 1013)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Prime Minister: Staffing (Question No. 1111)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Arts: Staffing (Question No. 1116)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research: Staffing (Question No. 1126)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research: Staffing (Question No. 1143)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Special Minister of State for the Public Service and Integrity: Staffing (Question No. 1148)
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Finance and Deregulation (Question No. 1171)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Special Minister of State (Question No. 1198)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Defence (Question Nos 503 and 779)
Page: 7454
Senator McEWEN (South Australia—Government Whip in the Senate) (19:44): Thank you, Mr Acting Deputy President. I too would like to contribute to this debate on the report currently the subject of a motion moved—
Senator Colbeck: Mr Acting Deputy President, I rise on a point of order. There was a matter before the chair which had not been determined by you as the chair when you gave the call to Senator McEwen. That matter was subsequently dealt with. Senator McEwen could not have had the call when there was still a matter before the chair that you, as chair, had not finalised. You cannot say that Senator McEwen had the call because the matter before the chair was Senator Abetz's request for the motion that he had moved. You cannot give the call to Senator McEwen on the guise that she had the call before you dealt with that matter because you as chair had to deal with that matter before you could give anybody the call. The matter was essentially with Senator Abetz.
Senator Bob Brown: Mr Acting Deputy President, on a point of order: there are two matters here. Firstly, you were quite right in giving the call to Senator McEwen. We were dealing with the government responses to parliamentary committee reports and Senator Abetz tried to intervene on that with another matter. You quite rightly discounted his ability to do that, and that should have pertained.
I welcome the President of the Senate to the chair. That was a correct ruling. However, Senator Abetz persisted in wanting to seek leave, which should have waited. When leave was not given he sat down. You then rightly gave the call to the senator on your right. That ruling should remain.
The PRESIDENT: I have not been here for the situation, and I note the hour of the night, but I do understand that there is a question before the chair. The question before the chair is that the report be taken note of. That is the question that is before the chair at this stage.
Honourable senators interjecting—
The PRESIDENT: Order! The question before the chair has to be disposed of. That is the first thing that must take place in the order of debate. The question must be disposed of, and the question before the chair is that the report be taken note of.
Senator Ian Macdonald interjecting—
The PRESIDENT: Senator Macdonald, I have not given you the call. Senator McEwen.
Senator McEWEN: Mr President—
Senator Ian Macdonald: Point of order, Mr President!
The PRESIDENT: Senator Macdonald!
Senator McEWEN: Mr President, I have a point of order. My point of order is that I stood with the intention of taking note of the report listed at page 8 on today's Notice Paper. I made it quite clear that my intention was to contribute to the debate.
Debate interrupted.