

- Title
BILLS
Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2012
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
21-03-2012
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT
- Page
2483
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/34dcc858-84ef-4fe3-9144-f6f97af26110/0166
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- MOTIONS
-
BILLS
- Indirect Tax Laws Amendment (Assessment) Bill 2012
- Fair Work Amendment (Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry) Bill 2011 [2012]
- Broadcasting Services Amendment (Regional Commercial Radio) Bill 2011 [2012]
- Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2012
- Excise Amendment (Reducing Business Compliance Burden) Bill 2011, Customs Amendment (Reducing Business Compliance Burden) Bill 2011
- Telecommunications Universal Service Management Agency Bill 2011
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Defence Exercises
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Bob) -
Carbon Pricing
(Edwards, Sen Sean, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Infrastructure
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Member for Dobell
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Murray-Darling Basin
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Military Justice
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Harmony Day
(Furner, Sen Mark, Lundy, Sen Kate)
-
Defence Exercises
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- DOCUMENTS
-
BILLS
-
Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2011
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Third Reading
- Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2012
- Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2011-2012, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2011-2012
-
Australian Research Council Amendment Bill 2011
- FIRST SPEECH
- BILLS
- BUDGET
- BILLS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 2483
Senator JACINTA COLLINS (Victoria—Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Parliamentary Secretary for School Education and Workplace Relations) (16:18): I thank the Senate and those who have contributed to the debate on the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2012. The bill would if enacted amend four acts to strengthen and clarify aspects of the Commonwealth's financial framework and repeal two acts that include special appropriations, which are now redundant.
I wish to offer a point of clarification on the proposed provisions for set-out arrangements under item 10 of schedule 4 of the bill, which would introduce a new section 35 to the FMA framework. It is the intention of the government to institute a consultative process around the use of this provision. The minister will consult with members of the parliament on this process. For example, there is regulation-making power linked to the proposed section 35 included in the bill through the proposed amendment to section 65 of the FMA Act which is set out in item 13 of schedule 4 of the bill. Such regulations could potentially use an approach that already exists for an act of grace or debt waiver provisions, such as to specify that a decision maker must have available an advisory committee report where the amount involved exceeds a prescribed limit.
I would like to put on the record some further information in terms of the use of this provision for an amount that the Commonwealth merely asserts as a debt. If Senator Cormann is happy, I am happy to incorporate the rest of my speech.
Leave granted.
The speech read as follows—
The amount in question must be established as a debt owing before the proposed section 35 could be applied.
The set-off provision could not be applied where:
the amount is not objectively ascertainable;
there is a genuine dispute regarding the amount owing; or
the amount is not capable of being recovered.
In general, this Bill will help with the preparation of the Budget, such as through the changes to the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997, and make useful clarifications, such as the role of the Auditor-General in auditing companies controlled by the Commonwealth.
I commend the Bill.
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT: The question is that the bill be read a second time.
Question agreed to.
Bill read a second time.