

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
Carbon Pricing
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
11-10-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
6978
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2dfe688b-5afe-4fc3-8193-efd303003d53/0050
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Carbon Pricing
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Economy
(Polley, Sen Helen, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Brown, Sen Bob, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing
(Williams, Sen John, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Steel Industry
(Singh, Sen Lisa, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Steel Industry
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Vocational Education and Training
(Rhiannon, Sen Lee, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Carbon Pricing
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Defence (Question Nos 500 to 502)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Health (Question No. 541)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Foreign Affairs (Question No. 545)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs: Overseas Delegations (Question No. 547)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Papua New Guinea (Question No. 556)
(Johnston, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Foreign Affairs: Staffing (Question No. 616)
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Immigration Detention Centres (Question No. 674)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence (Question Nos 695 to 696)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Foreign Affairs: Websites (Question No. 725)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Defence (Question Nos 776 to 778)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 962)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 963)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 964)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 965)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 966)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 967)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 968)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 969)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 970)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 971)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 972)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 973)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 974)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 975)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 976)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 977)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 978)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 979)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 980)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 981)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Carbon Pricing (Question No. 982)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Australian Taxation Office (Question No. 987)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Asylum Seekers (Question No. 1011)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Special Minister of State: Staffing (Question No. 1014)
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1031)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations (Question No. 1033)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (Question No. 1035)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Attorney-General (Question No. 1037)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Attorney-General (Question No. 1038)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Fair Work Australia (Question No. 1042)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question Nos 1043, 1048, 1065, 1067, 1072 and 1082)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations, School Education, Early Childhood and Youth, Employment Participation and Childcare, and Indigenous Employment and Economic Development: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question Nos 1045, 1057, 1070 and 1073)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question No. 1058)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Question No. 1060)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Human Services (Question No. 1066)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Small Business: Code of Conduct Investigations (Question No. 1075)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Special Minister of State: Staffing (Question No. 1089)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Treasury: Accommodation (Question No. 1091)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Treasury (Question No. 1092)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
National Plan for Clean Air (Question No. 1094)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Treasury (Question Nos 1159, 1194 and 1195)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Infrastructure and Transport (Question No. 1167)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Human Services: Staffing (Question No. 1181)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Treasury (Question No. 1205)
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Defence (Question Nos 500 to 502)
Page: 6978
Senator CORMANN (Western Australia) (15:16): The carbon tax is a bad tax based on a lie. The original deception of the Australian people was in the lead up to the last election, when the Prime Minister promised that there would be no carbon tax under a government she leads. Even now, the Labor-Green alliance continues to deceive the Australian people. The reason it wants to rush this legislation through the parliament this week is because it knows that every day that goes by with more parliamentary scrutiny, more flaws and more deceptions will be exposed.
The Labor-Green alliance wants people to believe that the carbon tax and the emissions trading scheme which is to follow will reduce global greenhouse gas emissions, but the carbon tax will do nothing of the sort. It will not even reduce emissions here in Australia. In the past, when we debated the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme legislation proposed by the former Prime Minister, Mr Rudd, I was concerned that the proposal was to reduce emissions in Australia in a way that would just shift them overseas into areas where emissions would be higher than they would be in Australia. To a degree that is still true under this bad carbon tax because, while emissions under the carbon tax will be somewhat lower in Australia than they otherwise would be, under the government's carbon pricing package emissions in Australia will continue to grow.
Do not take my word for it. When I asked Senator Wong today during question time to explain and confirm that she was not prepared to do so, but this information comes directly out of the Treasury's own modelling; it is there in black and white. Emissions now are 578 million tonnes. According to the Treasury modelling, under the carbon tax and the emissions trading scheme, emissions in 2020 will be 621 million tonnes. So emissions will go up. The government argues, 'Yes, but emissions will be lower than they otherwise would have been, so it is fair for us to claim that somehow emissions will go down.' Okay, if your argument is that something is falling even though it is going up, on the basis that it will be lower than it otherwise would have been, what about jobs? What about real wages? What about the economy? The Treasury modelling shows that, under the carbon tax and the emissions trading scheme, Australia's GDP will be 2.8 per cent lower by 2050 than it otherwise would have been. Using the government's rhetoric and spin in relation to emissions, that means that the economy is actually going to shrink. Economic growth is going to fall. This is the government's language. The Treasury modelling indicates that under the carbon tax real wages will be more than five per cent lower by 2050 than it otherwise would be. So real wages are falling. If you use the government's argument that emissions in Australia are falling even though they are going from 578 million tonnes to 621 million tonnes, because they will be lower than it otherwise would have been, then that means that real wages will fall, because they will be lower than they otherwise would have been.
The point here is that the carbon tax—a tax that the people of Australia do not want and which the government is pursuing and ramming through the parliament in defiance of the Australian people—will push up the cost of everything, will reduce our international competitiveness, will cost jobs and will result in lower wages. It will do all of that while emissions will continue to grow.
One final observation in relation to some of the comments by Senator Carr on local content is that if the Prime Minister were serious about achieving more local content she would scrap her carbon tax, which will make locally manufactured goods more expensive. Under the carbon tax we are in a ludicrous situation where higher emitting manufacturers overseas will become more competitive than lower emitting businesses in Australia. As higher emitting businesses overseas take market share away from us emissions internationally will go up, not down. This whole carbon tax is a joke. It is a bad tax based on a lie. The Labor Party knows it, which is why it wants to ram it through the parliament.