

- Title
BILLS
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
06-07-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4241
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Evans, Sen Christopher
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/22e3a414-6e29-45fc-ba0d-0db0be89287a/0177
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
- Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2011
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
-
In Committee
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Live Animal Exports
(Fisher, Sen Mary Jo, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Pensions and Benefits
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Carbon Pricing
(Brandis, Sen George, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Forestry
(Milne, Sen Christine, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Superannuation
(Thistlethwaite, Sen Matt, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Fuel Excise
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Wong, Sen Penny) - Workplace Relations
-
Carbon Pricing
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Live Animal Exports
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Fibre Deployment) Bill 2011
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Feeney, Sen David
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Feeney, Sen David
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
-
In Committee
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 4241
Senator CHRIS EVANS (Western Australia—Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (18:01): I am advised that, as we see it, the additionality test ensures that carbon credits represent an extra tonne of carbon abatement that can be used to offset emissions from an industrial sector, and it underpins the credibility and value of the carbon credits. Under the CFI, project proponents are required to consider natural resource management plans. Regional NRM plans provide a vehicle for communities to provide guidance of the type and location of carbon farming projects that will deliver maximum social and environmental benefits.
Ultimately, the market will determine what projects come forward, and those that have important co-benefits will naturally stack up better than those without. I get the sense that you are trying to bypass that and almost pick which projects, but we think that that is a better way of those projects being identified.