

- Title
BILLS
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
06-07-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
4238
- Party
Nats
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Nash, Sen Fiona
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/22e3a414-6e29-45fc-ba0d-0db0be89287a/0170
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- BILLS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
-
BILLS
- Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2011
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
-
In Committee
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Live Animal Exports
(Fisher, Sen Mary Jo, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Pensions and Benefits
(Urquhart, Sen Anne, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Carbon Pricing
(Brandis, Sen George, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Forestry
(Milne, Sen Christine, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Superannuation
(Thistlethwaite, Sen Matt, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Fuel Excise
(Fifield, Sen Mitch, Wong, Sen Penny) - Workplace Relations
-
Carbon Pricing
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Live Animal Exports
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Fibre Deployment) Bill 2011
-
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011, Carbon Credits (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2011, Australian National Registry of Emissions Units Bill 2011
-
In Committee
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Evans, Sen Christopher
- Feeney, Sen David
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Feeney, Sen David
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Feeney, Sen David
- Nash, Sen Fiona
- Feeney, Sen David
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
-
In Committee
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 4238
Senator NASH (New South Wales—Deputy Leader of The Nationals in the Senate) (17:45): I was actually in the middle of asking some questions of the minister and I think the minister may be placed in a rather invidious position with the continuation of this questioning. Following on from his previous answer that was indeed an entire load of gobbledegook and the fact that he could use common sense and apples for apples as criteria to determine whether or not a project was going to pass the common practice test was quite an extraordinary thing for me to have to take back to my constituency and explain to them that the minister thought they were fine criteria. Given that the minister is not here, I certainly do not expect you, Minister Evans, to answer that question, given the complex nature of the question that I asked and the legislation itself.
Could I perhaps just ask at this stage—and I understand time constraints and other pressing matters—is the minister intending to return to deal with this? Is he on his way or is he not going to be with us for some time?