Permalink
Prev
Next
Return to results list



- Title
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-11-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
Queensland
- Interjector
- Page
2298
- Party
NATS
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-11-25/0158
Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
Table Of Contents
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Labor Government
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Chris) -
New Zealand: Mine Explosion
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Broadband
(Brandis, Sen George, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
(Milne, Sen Christine, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Broadband
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Soccer World Cup
(Cameron, Sen Doug, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Broadband
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Banking
(Fielding, Sen Steve, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Labor Government
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
-
In Committee
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Cash, Sen Michaelia
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Barnett, Sen Guy
- Trood, Sen Russell
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Cameron, Sen Doug
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Sterle, Sen Glenn
- Ferguson, Sen Alan
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Lundy, Sen Kate
-
In Committee
- BUSINESS
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
-
In Committee
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Birmingham, Sen Simon
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Ludlam, Sen Scott
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
-
In Committee
- Adjournment
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Content Window
Thursday, 25 November 2010
Page: 2298
Page: 2298
Senator JOYCE (Leader of the Nationals in the Senate) (8:11 PM)
—You say they have the power to reject. Are they obligated, if it is in contravention, to reject? The question involves obligation—my stress is on the word ‘obligated’. If it is in contravention, are they obligated to reject?