

- Title
COMMITTEES
Procedure Committee
Report
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-11-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
- Page
1776
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Ferguson, Sen Alan
- Stage
Procedure Committee
- Type
- Context
Committees
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-11-22/0107
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Broadband
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Broadband
(Hurley, Sen Annette, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Broadband
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Woodside Energy Ltd
(Brown, Sen Bob, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Workplace Relations
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Goods and Services Tax
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Broadband
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- PLASTIC BAG LEVY (ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION) BILL 2010
- COMMITTEES
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- COMMITTEES
- INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
- NATIONAL BOWEL CANCER SCREENING PROGRAM
- NOTICES
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- NOTICES
- DOCUMENTS
-
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MISCELLANEOUS MEASURES) BILL 2010
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND AMENDMENT BILL 2010
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES (EXCISE) LEVIES AMENDMENT BILL 2010
CARER RECOGNITION BILL 2010
TRADEX SCHEME AMENDMENT BILL 2010
OZONE PROTECTION AND SYNTHETIC GREENHOUSE GAS MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT BILL 2010 - COMMITTEES
- HIGHER EDUCATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (STUDENT SERVICES AND AMENITIES) BILL 2010
-
CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (CLUSTER MUNITIONS PROHIBITION) BILL 2010
FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010 - COMMITTEES
- EDUCATION SERVICES FOR OVERSEAS STUDENTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- COMMITTEES
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (COMPETITION AND CONSUMER SAFEGUARDS) BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
-
NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS SCHEME) BILL 2010
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Trood, Sen Russell
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Trood, Sen Russell
- Third Reading
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2010 MEASURES NO. 4) BILL 2010
- TERRITORIES LAW REFORM BILL 2010
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Defence: Accommodation
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Staffing
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Staffing
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Staffing
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Staffing
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Staffing
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Staffing
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence Capability Plan
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Media Monitoring
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Overseas Travel
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Freedom of Information Requests
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Joint Strike Fighter
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Programs
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Reserves
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Defence Land
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Climate Change
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Lifeline
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Defence: Accommodation
Page: 1776
Senator FERGUSON (5:02 PM)
—I also commend this report to the Senate. The main thrust of this report is to try and accommodate private members’ bills and give them a dedicated timeslot for debate in this chamber. It is important because, in the past, governments and those managing the government’s program have always been able to say that debates on private members’ bills are only possible if time is allocated by the government. It is a move in the right direction to allow private members’ bills to be debated in this chamber.
It is only a temporary order and will require a lot of goodwill between the government, the opposition and the minor parties to make sure that it works smoothly. One thing we could not ensure was that private members’ bills or government bills were treated equally in this place. Initially there was some thought about perhaps putting shorter time limits on speeches or guillotining debate. A whole range of options were put forward. In fact, a private member’s bill is just as important as any other bill that comes into this place and it must be treated equally. A senator may hope that their private senator’s bill reaches fruition in a short time, but that would only be able to be done by agreement, in the same way that many other bills are put through this place, particularly towards the end of the session. By agreement, they are dealt with in an expeditious manner.
I look forward to the trial. I think it can work but, as I said before, it will take a lot of goodwill for it to be as successful as many senators, particularly those from minor parties, would hope it to be. Let’s see how it works. We have six months in the first half of next year to see how it progresses. Individual senators can still only expect to get the opportunity to debate their bills in a ratio of proportionality in this chamber, or close to proportionality—it will not always be exact—but I am sure that, if we go about it in the right manner, this can be a very successful addition to the procedures that we follow in this place. I certainly commend this report to the Senate.