

- Title
PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION REPORT
Order
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
16-11-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
- Page
1336
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Stage
Order
- Type
- Context
Motions
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-11-16/0070
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CONNECTING PEOPLE WITH JOBS) BILL 2010
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL PREVENTIVE HEALTH AGENCY BILL 2010
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Gillard Government
(Fifield, Sen Mitchell, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Climate Change
(Moore, Sen Claire, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Water Infrastructure
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Automotive Industry
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Broadband
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Health: Disease Control
(Milne, Sen Christine, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Broadband
(Kroger, Sen Helen, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Broadband
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Antisiphoning List
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Gillard Government
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
-
COMMITTEES
- Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee
- Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee
- National Capital and External Territories Committee
- Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee
- Corporations and Financial Services Committee
- Environment and Communications References Committee
- PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION REPORT
- LANGUAGE RIGHTS OF TIBETANS
- MENTAL HEALTH
- FOOD STANDARDS AMENDMENT (TRUTH IN LABELLING—GENETICALLY MODIFIED MATERIAL) BILL 2010
- ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS
- BUSINESS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AVIATION CRIMES AND POLICING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL PREVENTIVE HEALTH AGENCY BILL 2010
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1336
Senator CORMANN (3:44 PM)
—I seek leave to amend general business motion No. 84 standing in my name relating to the production of a Productivity Commission report on the selection of default superannuation funds and the modern awards by omitting 30 April 2011 in paragraph (c) and substituting 31 May 2011.
Leave granted.
Senator CORMANN
—I move the motion as amended:
That the Senate—
(a) notes that:
(i) the current process to select default superannuation funds under modern awards is not transparent, not objective or evidence based, not competitive and not subject to systematic review,
(ii) the top ten most commonly listed default funds under modern awards are all union based industry super funds, with these ten funds listed as default super funds in modern awards 330 times,
(iii) the Cooper Review into superannuation also confirmed that current default superannuation fund arrangements undermined competition as new employees typically become a member of a default fund, and
(iv) a competitive, transparent and efficient superannuation industry is critically important to maximise value for all superannuants;
(b) endorses the Labor Party’s commitment before the 2010 election to instruct the Productivity Commission to design a process for the selection and ongoing review of the superannuation funds to be included in modern awards or enterprise agreements as default funds; and
(c) orders that there be laid on the table, no later than 31 May 2011, a report by the Productivity Commission on the design of a process for the selection and ongoing review of the superannuation funds to be included in modern awards or enterprise agreements as default funds, with the requirements that:
(i) the process is to be based on objective criteria and evidence and be subject to systematic review, so that the selection and ongoing review of eligible default funds is transparent and competitive,
(ii) the process is to help maximise employees’ retirement incomes by ensuring that only those superannuation funds that deliver - and continue to deliver - the best results to their members are able to be included as default fund options in modern awards and enterprise agreements, and
(iii) in designing the process the Productivity Commission make reference to the existing sophisticated system of superannuation fund ratings which has evolved over the past 20 years and is already used widely by employees, employers and financial planners in making decisions on fund selection.