

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Economy
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-10-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
New South Wales
- Interjector
PRESIDENT, The
- Page
586
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Responder
Wong, Sen Penny
- Speaker
- Stage
Economy
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-10-25/0013
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Federal Election
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Chris (Leader of the Government in the Senate)) -
Economy
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Asylum Seekers
(Fisher, Sen Mary Jo, Carr, Sen Kim) -
National Broadband Network
(Wortley, Sen Dana, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Asylum Seekers
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Indigenous Suicide
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Murray-Darling Basin
(Payne, Sen Marise, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Indigenous Employment
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Evans, Sen Chris (Leader of the Government in the Senate), Evans, Sen Chris)
-
Federal Election
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- CONDOLENCES
- CONDOLENCES
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- RESTORING TERRITORY RIGHTS (VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA LEGISLATION) BILL 2010
- TOBACCO ADVERTISING
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE COMMISSIONER
- COMMITTEES
-
CARER RECOGNITION BILL 2010
CIVIL DISPUTE RESOLUTION BILL 2010
FOOD STANDARDS AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND AMENDMENT BILL 2010
INTERNATIONAL TAX AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2010
NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS SCHEME) BILL 2010
OZONE PROTECTION AND SYNTHETIC GREENHOUSE GAS MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT BILL 2010
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES (EXCISE) LEVIES AMENDMENT BILL 2010
PROTECTION OF THE SEA LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
TRADEX SCHEME AMENDMENT BILL 2010
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MISCELLANEOUS MEASURES) BILL 2010
NATIONAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
PARLIAMENTARY JOINT COMMITTEE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT BILL 2010
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM AND GREENHOUSE GAS STORAGE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MISCELLANEOUS MEASURES) BILL 2010
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM AND GREENHOUSE GAS STORAGE (SAFETY LEVIES) AMENDMENT BILL 2010 - COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- INTERNATIONAL TAX AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2010
- NATIONAL MEASUREMENT AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- SERVICE AND EXECUTION OF PROCESS AMENDMENT (INTERSTATE FINE ENFORCEMENT) BILL 2010
- WATER EFFICIENCY LABELLING AND STANDARDS AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- PROTECTION OF THE SEA LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Pest and Weed Management
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Health and Ageing: Accommodation
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
British Nuclear Test Program
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Internet Content
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Medical Services Advisory Committee
(Milne, Sen Christine, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Northern Territory: Mandatory Leases
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Pest and Weed Management
Page: 586
Senator FORSHAW (2:05 PM)
—My question is to the Minister for Finance and Deregulation, Senator Wong. Can the minister inform the Senate about the importance of competition in the banking sector and why competition in the banking sector is important to Australian households?
Senator WONG (Minister for Finance and Deregulation)
—I thank Senator Forshaw for his question and for his interest in this issue, which is of course fundamental to ensuring that we maximise the benefits for Australian families when it comes to the home loan interest rates on offer. We know that the global financial crisis had a very big impact on competition in the banking sector, something which might have passed by those opposite. Those on this side of the chamber understand the impact on competition in the banking sector that the GFC hit. It hit small lenders particularly hard, and this government acted to ensure that we took measures to boost competition in the mortgage market. These include helping small lenders fund their home loans, new loans to crack down on unfair mortgage exit fees and our bank guarantees. Those opposite might recall the $16 billion of investment in the AAA rated residential mortgage backed securities, which have been critical in supporting this important funding market.
The reason the government did this is that we understand that competitive pressures give banks the incentive to offer the best products to Australians at the best possible prices, and this includes encouraging banks to offer the most competitive mortgage rates. We understand, on this side of the chamber, that working families are facing cost-of-living pressures. The government’s reforms are aimed at boosting competition in the banking sector and helping Australian families, because competition means more choice for Australian consumers. This sensible approach from the government stands in stark contrast to that which is advocated by the so-called ‘economics team’ of the opposition. (Time expired)
Senator FORSHAW
—Mr President, I have a supplementary question, and a very important one. Can the minister outline to the Senate the importance of independent determination of interest rates? Is the minister aware of any alternative approaches which would pose a threat to competition in the banking sector and therefore to Australian households?
Senator WONG (Minister for Finance and Deregulation)
—I think everybody should know that the independence of the Reserve Bank is critical to ensuring stable economic management, and everyone should know that if interest rates were to be re-regulated that would, amongst other things, restrict the flow of credit to Australian households and Australian businesses. The Secretary of Treasury commented in estimates that re-regulating interest rates would hit lower income earners harder because, obviously, banks would ration credit. This appears to be a point lost on the shadow Treasurer.
The shadow Treasurer seems to be heading headlong down a path towards re-regulation of interest rates, a path that he cannot even convince his own colleagues to support. It was quite extraordinary last week watching the member for Canning describing the shadow Treasurer’s proposal as a ‘lunatic fringe’ idea from the man who seeks to be Treasurer. I see that Mr Turnbull has also tried to distance himself from this rather extraordinary proposition— (Time expired)
Honourable senators interjecting—
The PRESIDENT
—When there is silence on both sides, we will proceed. Senator Forshaw is waiting to ask the next question.
Senator FORSHAW
—Mr President, I ask a further supplementary question. Can the minister further inform the Senate of any significant risks to the Australian economy through additional regulation?
Senator WONG (Minister for Finance and Deregulation)
—We know that the prospect of re-regulating interest rates is not the only economic thought-bubble that the opposition has come up with this month. I think it was quite extraordinary to observe the shadow finance minister recently appear to advocate some form of government intervention in relation to the dollar. I think everybody ought to know that Australia’s floating currency has, for more than a quarter of a century, served our nation well. Yet we see Mr Robb—supposedly one of the dries—coming out and saying that we should be looking at ways to impact on the dollar. It is interesting. I wonder what the former finance minister, Senator Minchin, would have thought about Mr Robb’s ideas. What was even more interesting was reading what the opposition colleagues thought about this. One is quoted in the Australian as saying:
“This is certainly not Coalition policy … this was just Joe being Joe.”
and another as saying:
“Joe and Andrew should wear tie-dye shirts and flares because they’re stuck in the ’70s,” …
(Time expired)