

- Title
PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-06-2010
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
DEPUTY PRESIDENT, The
- Page
3902
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Personal Explanations
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2010-06-22/0071
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- AFGHANISTAN
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- APPROPRIATIONS
- BUSINESS
-
RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) AMENDMENT BILL 2010
RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) (CHARGE) AMENDMENT BILL 2010
RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) (SMALL-SCALE TECHNOLOGY SHORTFALL CHARGE) BILL 2010 - QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Broadband
(Farrell, Sen Don, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Migration
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Budget
(Wortley, Sen Dana, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Council of Australian Governments
(Payne, Sen Marise, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Driver Training
(Brown, Sen Bob, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Broadband
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Indigenous Employment
(Moore, Sen Claire, Arbib, Sen Mark) -
Government Advertising
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Ludwig, Sen Joe)
-
Broadband
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- NOTICES
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NATIONAL INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER BILL 2010
- COMMITTEES
- DOUBLE DISSOLUTION
- MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
- TRANSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY
- MANDATORY VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS
- WASTE MANAGEMENT STUDY
- VISIT OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
- DALAI LAMA AND TIBET
- CONTRIBUTION OF REFUGEES TO AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY
- WATER SUPPLY FOR ADELAIDE
- COMMITTEES
- GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING
- MOTOR NEURONE DISEASE
- COMMITTEES
- ENERGY EFFICIENT HOMES PACKAGE
- NOTICES
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
-
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2010-2011
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2010-2011
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2010-2011
CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (CORPORATE REPORTING REFORM) BILL 2010
FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PRUDENTIAL REFINEMENTS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2010
NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (CONTINENCE AIDS PAYMENT SCHEME) BILL 2010
TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2010 GST ADMINISTRATION MEASURES NO. 3) BILL 2010
TERRITORIES LAW REFORM BILL 2010 - AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- AVIATION TRANSPORT SECURITY AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2010 (NO. 1)
- WILD RIVERS (ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT) BILL 2010 (NO.2)
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 3902
Senator CORMANN (3:33 PM)
—As I noted before, in accordance with standing order 191 I seek to explain statements I made yesterday about the so-called deal between NBN Co. and Telstra, as they were misquoted or misunderstood by Senator Conroy. Senator Conroy asserted that, in pointing out that there was no deal to deliver a national broadband network between NBN Co. and Telstra but just a deal to try to do a deal, I had somehow not only accused the government of putting spin above substance but also by implication accused Telstra of trying to spin this announcement, which is not true at all. This is where I think Senator Conroy has clearly misunderstood or misquoted my statements yesterday. What I did yesterday was point out specific statements in Telstra’s letter—
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT
—Senator Cormann, you cannot go on and repeat what you said yesterday; you can only say where you claim to have been misquoted or misunderstood.
Senator CORMANN
—I claim that I have been misunderstood or misquoted by Senator Conroy in his assertion that I was accusing Telstra of trying to spin the announcement of a deal between NBN Co. and Telstra. What I did do was point out that Telstra, in its letter to shareholders, pointed out that there were still many complex issues to be resolved and there was no guarantee that it would progress to completion.
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT
—You are now debating the issue. You cannot go any further than what you have already done.