Save Search
    Prev   Next   Return to results listPrint ListEmail Document Link

Title

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

AUSTRALIAN CLIMATE CHANGE REGULATORY AUTHORITY BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME (CHARGES—CUSTOMS) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME (CHARGES—EXCISE) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME (CHARGES—GENERAL) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME (CPRS FUEL CREDITS) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME (CPRS FUEL CREDITS) (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT (CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT (CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

CARBON POLLUTION REDUCTION SCHEME AMENDMENT (HOUSEHOLD ASSISTANCE) BILL 2009 [NO. 2]

In Committee

Database

Senate Hansard

Date

25-11-2009

Source

Senate

Parl No.

42

Electorate

New South Wales

Interjector

 

Page

8918

Party

NATS

Presenter

 

Status

Final

Question No.

 

Questioner

 

Responder

 

Speaker

Nash, Sen Fiona

Stage

In Committee

Type

 

Context

Bills

System Id

chamber/hansards/2009-11-25/0284


Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Current HansardDownload Current Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Page: 8918


Senator NASH (9:23 PM) —To be absolutely clear, it is fully offset for the three years and after that the review will take place. All right, thanks. Minister, thank you very much for supplying those figures from ABARE around the percentages for the input costs—although I think ABARE was the same organisation that predicted the price of a barrel of oil some time ago. I think you said that is a percentage of on-farm input costs. What inputs were taken into account in determining those figures?