

- Title
FAIR WORK AMENDMENT (PAID PARENTAL LEAVE) BILL 2009
Second Reading
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
13-05-2009
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
- Page
2640
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Hanson-Young, Sen Sarah
- Stage
Second Reading
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2009-05-13/0098
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
EXCISE TARIFF VALIDATION BILL 2009
CUSTOMS TARIFF VALIDATION BILL 2009- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Cormann, Sen Mathias
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Third Reading
-
AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP BILL 2009
AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENT) BILL 2009 - MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Budget
(Minchin, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Budget
(Moore, Sen Claire, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Budget
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Swine Influenza
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Budget
(Brandis, Sen George, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Budget
(Sterle, Sen Glenn, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Rural and Regional Health Services
(Nash, Sen Fiona, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Aged Care
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Budget
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Budget
(Polley, Sen Helen, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Budget
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- CONDOLENCES
- BROADBAND
- SRI LANKA
- FAIR WORK AMENDMENT (PAID PARENTAL LEAVE) BILL 2009
- RADIOACTIVE WASTE
- NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK
- COMMITTEES
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
-
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2009
SOCIAL SECURITY AND FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (2009 BUDGET MEASURES) BILL 2009 - PUBLIC INTEREST IMMUNITY
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
-
AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP BILL 2009
AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENT) BILL 2009 - COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Ministerial Staffing
(Minchin, Sen Nick, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Ministerial Staffing
(Minchin, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Ministerial Staffing
(Minchin, Sen Nick, Faulkner, Sen John) -
Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry: Overseas Travel
(Minchin, Sen Nick, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Minister for Human Services: Overseas Travel
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Assistant Treasurer: Overseas Travel
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Minister for Housing and Minister for the Status of Women: Overseas Travel
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Minister for Small Business, Independent Contractors and the Service Economy: Overseas Travel
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law: Overseas Travel
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet: Publication
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Council of Australian Governments: Funding
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Social Inclusion, Employment Participation and Youth: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Treasury: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Defence: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Faulkner, Sen John) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Climate Change: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Human Services: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Resouces, Energy and Tourism: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Treasury: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Finance and Deregulation: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Faulkner, Sen John) -
Finance and Deregulation: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Resources, Energy and Tourism: Program Funding
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Reserve Bank of Australia
(Bushby, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
The Lodge and Kirribilli House
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Tobacco Industry
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Aged Care: Facilities
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Aged Care
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Alcopops
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Aged Care
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
(Fifield, Sen Mitchell, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Ministerial Staffing
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Proclamation of Acts
(Cash, Sen Michaelia, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Residential Mortgage Backed Securities
(Brown, Sen Bob, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Proposed Pulp Mill
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Immigration and Citizenship: Project Funding
(Mason, Sen Brett, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Health and Ageing: Moncrieff Electorate
(Mason, Sen Brett, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Climate Change: Moncrieff Electorate
(Mason, Sen Brett, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Country Areas Program
(Milne, Sen Christine, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Prime Minister
(Barnett, Sen Guy, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Climate Change
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Nation Building and Jobs Plan
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Kyoto Protocol
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny)
-
Ministerial Staffing
Page: 2640
Senator HANSON-YOUNG (3:40 PM)
—I present the explanatory memorandum and move:
That this bill be now read a second time.
I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in Hansard.
Leave granted.
The speech read as follows—
Fair Work Amendment (Paid Parental Leave) Bill 2009
The Fair Work Amendment (Paid Parental Leave) Bill 2009 amends the Fair Work Act 2009 and builds upon the existing provisions for unpaid parental leave, to provide for a system of paid parental leave that will assist all eligible Australian parents who take time off from their employment upon the birth or adoption of a child.
For more than thirty years, Australian women have been calling for action on paid parental leave, and despite a commitment in last night’s budget for the introduction of an 18 week scheme, the fact that it will be delayed until 2011 suggests that the Government is not really serious about legislating for this basic workplace entitlement.
The Government’s continued use of the global financial crisis as an excuse to delay the introduction of paid parental leave is starting to wear thin on the Australian community.
Paid parental leave is, and should be, viewed as an important pillar of childhood development, and last night’s budget proved the opportune time to immediately invest in, and stimulate our economy, and putting money in the pockets of parents is the obvious way to go.
Research conducted by the Australia Institute last month suggests that “the spending and living patterns of young families combine to create a strong economic case for introducing paid parental leave,” again highlighting, the obvious benefits such a scheme would have on the economy.
Paid parental leave has been long standing Green policy, and legislative action on this issue has been long overdue. And while it is often said that Australia is only one of two OECD countries without a universal scheme of paid parental leave, we must remember that more than 50% of Ameri-can women are eligible for some form of gov-ernment-funded paid parental leave, while more than two-thirds of Australian working women continue to miss out.
When you consider that Sweden offer 47 weeks, New Zealand offer 28 weeks, Finland offer 32 weeks, and even Spain offer 27 weeks, the fact that Australia is still behind the eight ball on these basic supports for working families is concerning.
Paid parental leave must be seen as a workplace entitlement, and this includes ensuring that any payment must be treated as a wage for the purposes of taxation, superannuation and other related laws and agreements.
The fact that the unpaid parental leave provisions are included in the Fair Work Act, suggests that paid parental leave is an obvious inclusion, and I am concerned that the Government’s proposed scheme will not comprehensively address the significance of workplace attachment, for women in particular.
This legislation therefore, amends the Fair Work Act to provide for 26 weeks Government-funded paid leave at or around the birth or adoption of a child for all eligible Australian parents, at the level of the minimum wage, or if they earn less than this (e.g. part-time or casual workers), at their average wage, with a guaranteed income and a right to return to work at the end of it.
What the Bill does:
Essentially, this Bill provides paid leave for all eligible parents—mothers and fathers, adoptive parents, parents in same-sex relationships, and those working in both the public and private sectors, and the self employed—who have worked for their current employer for a minimum of 12 months.
This Bill requires that six weeks leave is quaran-tined solely for the birth mother as birth related leave, with the remaining 20 weeks may be split between the two parents at their discretion. Eligi-ble adoptive parents can share the 26 weeks.
This Bill also ensures that if an eligible employee takes a period of paid parental leave, then neither the employee or the employee’s spouse or de facto partner is entitled to the Baby Bonus or any other paid maternity, paternity, or parental leave payment under any other Commonwealth, state or territory law.
Paid parental leave is not intended to discriminate against at-home parents; rather, it is to facilitate workplace attachment, as an entitlement for employees.
The importance of recognising paid parental leave as a workplace entitlement is essential, and this Bill will ensure that just like long service leave or sick leave, employees will continue to accumulate superannuation payments.
Cost to the Government:
It is estimated that the total net cost of the Paid Parental Leave scheme contained in this Bill is approximately $740 million per annum for Government and approximately $90 million per annum for business, making a net cost of approximately $830 million per annum.
Community support for Parental Leave:
Support for parental leave has been gaining mo-mentum for years, and while Parliamentary action on this issue is long overdue, we must recognise the tireless efforts of another South Australian, who introduced the first paid maternity leave Bill back in 2002, former Senator Natasha Stott De-spoja. The National Foundation for Australian Women, the YWCA, the Commission for Chil-dren and Young People, the World Health Organi-zation, the Public Health Association, the Austra-lian Breastfeeding Association, Unions NSW, the National Tertiary Education Union, the Commu-nity and Public Sector Union, and the Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union, have all advocated for a 26-week, government-funded paid parental leave scheme to be introduced in Australia.
Given the World Health Organization, the Australian Breastfeeding Association and the Public Health Association all advocate 26-weeks paid leave for mothers promoting and supporting exclusive breastfeeding for six months, again highlights the community and sector support for such a scheme.
Last month Auspoll released research—commissioned by the National Foundation for Australian Women, Unions NSW, Commission for Children and Young People, Catalyst Australia and the YWCA Australia—surveying 1,703 respondents aged between 18 and 64 years on their views on paid parental leave and tax.
The research showed that four out of five Australians—82 per cent—would prefer the Federal Budget to fund parental leave rather than tax breaks for high income earners. While Minister Macklin announced the Government’s intention to introduce an 18 month paid parental leave scheme, the fact that this scheme will not be rolled out until January 2011, after the next election, will not bode well with the electorate.
Paid parental leave—it’s affordable:
According to a recent report commissioned by the Australia Institute, entitled Long overdue: The macroeconomic benefits of paid parental leave, the introduction of a paid parental leave scheme in Australia would pay for itself, stimulate the economy and create 9,000 new jobs.
Support for parents in their efforts to care for their newborn children is an essential component of any Government policy that aims to promote the health and well-being of infants, and invest in the long-term health and educational outcomes of children.
This legislation will ensure that paid parental leave is finally viewed as a workplace entitlement in the true sense of the word. It is time to stop punishing Australian families for having children, and start valuing the work of mothers and fathers and appreciate the economic benefits of introducing a paid parental leave scheme, not only for the economy, but also for the community.
We know we can afford it, we know it’s beneficial for the economy, and we know the majority of Australians support it.
January 2011 is another eighteen months away, and I urge the Government to look closely at the Greens fully-costed model for 26-weeks paid parental leave to get the ball rolling on this basic workplace entitlement.
I commend this Bill to the Senate.
Senator HANSON-YOUNG
—I seek leave to continue my remarks later.
Leave granted; debate adjourned.