

- Title
EDUCATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE BILL 2008
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
02-12-2008
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
Moore, Sen Claire (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Page
73
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Proof
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Milne, Sen Christine
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2008-12-02/0159
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
-
EDUCATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE BILL 2008 - QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Workplace Relations
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Broadband
(Fisher, Sen Mary Jo, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian National Academy of Music
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Oceania Nautica
(Trood, Sen Russell, Faulkner, Sen John) -
Economy
(Furner, Sen Mark, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Border Protection
(Johnston, Sen David, Wong, Sen Penny) -
National Education Agreement
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Workplace Relations
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- TREES FOR LIFE
- GAZA STRIP
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC
- COMMITTEES
- MR JOERN UTZON
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- WATER AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- COMMITTEES
-
NATION-BUILDING FUNDS BILL 2008
NATION-BUILDING FUNDS (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2008
COAG REFORM FUND BILL 2008 - COMMITTEES
- PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM JUNK FOOD ADVERTISING (BROADCASTING AMENDMENT) BILL 2008
-
EDUCATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE BILL 2008- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Division
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Division
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Third Reading
- WATER AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 73
Senator MILNE (9:05 PM)
—The Greens will not be supporting this amendment. The government has made it very clear from day one that it intends to introduce a national curriculum. I think there is merit in having a national curriculum. I think there is merit in standardising things across the country and getting some sense across the country. I agree with the private schools when they say that there is no clarity about what the national curriculum will be. At this stage, though, I reiterate, again, that Steiner education or Montessori education or any of those educations, it is a way of teaching—it is a philosophy, a pedagogy. It is not a curriculum as such. So it is a very different scenario, if you like. You are not saying, ‘In a Steiner school they will teach this, that and the other; therefore they can’t adhere to a national curriculum.’ It is the manner in which they approach the teaching of a national curriculum that defines the nature of the school, the nature of the philosophy and so on. Frankly, I think it is a beat-up. I do not think that is the major concern. The reason, as I said before, that I moved for two years is that that would give people two years from henceforth to be part of an ongoing negotiating process. A committee has been set up for this purpose. That committee will be negotiating in the next couple of years. Had we just gone for two years, at that point schools could have determined what is actually in the curriculum.
However, that is not the view of the House. I think it is completely unreasonable to say that private schools want the funding but they want it without the conditions which the government have made very clear and which I think are very appropriate, one being the national curriculum and the other being the accountability measures. Again, for a long time the community have said that they want to know exactly what the financial scenarios are for various schools. That includes all sources of funding to private schools because people want to know about the equity issues. As I said before, the tension and division in the community is because they can see inequity when they drive past a school, let alone go into it. You can see exactly what is going on. So I support the national curriculum being part of this bill and a condition for funding.