

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
Border Protection
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
02-12-2008
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
Coonan, Sen Helen
- Page
27
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Proof
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Ronaldson, Sen Michael
- Stage
Border Protection
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice: Take Note of Answers
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2008-12-02/0031
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
-
EDUCATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE BILL 2008 - QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Workplace Relations
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Broadband
(Fisher, Sen Mary Jo, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Australian National Academy of Music
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Oceania Nautica
(Trood, Sen Russell, Faulkner, Sen John) -
Economy
(Furner, Sen Mark, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Border Protection
(Johnston, Sen David, Wong, Sen Penny) -
National Education Agreement
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Workplace Relations
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- TREES FOR LIFE
- GAZA STRIP
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC
- COMMITTEES
- MR JOERN UTZON
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- WATER AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- COMMITTEES
-
NATION-BUILDING FUNDS BILL 2008
NATION-BUILDING FUNDS (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2008
COAG REFORM FUND BILL 2008 - COMMITTEES
- PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM JUNK FOOD ADVERTISING (BROADCASTING AMENDMENT) BILL 2008
-
EDUCATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE BILL 2008- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Division
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Division
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Mason, Sen Brett
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Xenophon, Sen Nick
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Third Reading
- WATER AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 27
Senator RONALDSON (3:29 PM)
—I rise to take note of the answer given by Senator Wong in relation to the Australian National Academy of Music. I am very pleased to be co-sponsoring the motion this afternoon with Senator Milne. I also acknowledge the presence in the gallery of some of our fine students from the Australian National Academy of Music. Can I say to them and to those many thousands of people who are appalled at this decision: we will continue to fight this on your behalf and on behalf of those students who are yet to start studying and who should be given the same opportunity.
This matter does not pass the political sniff test. What I want to know and what Senator Milne wants to know is what is actually behind this decision? What has driven this decision? What has driven a decision where there was no consultation, where these fine young people and their teachers were not consulted and were not advised? I will not go through the motion because honourable senators can read that for themselves. But I note that, on 22 October, the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts wrote to the chair of ANAM advising of ‘his concern that ANAM may not be the most effective or efficient model for the delivery of national programs supporting elite-level classical music training’. He then went on to say that he had asked his department to investigate alternative options for delivery of this training.
In relation to that letter of 28 October, in which the minister asked his department to investigate those options, will the minister immediately release whatever outcome there was of investigations which indicated that Melbourne university was the most appropriate institution to be taking over this training? I demand that answer, Senator Milne demands that answer and the young people in the gallery demand that answer. Will the minister immediately release that documentation? I suspect that it will be written on the back of a postage stamp, if it is written at all. I suspect it has not been and that there is a reason for this fabrication out of the minister’s office to justify the unjustifiable.
I also note with great interest that, at the end of August, the minister wrote to ANAM requesting that they introduce significant reforms to the way they conduct their training programs. The board wrote back and said that some of these reforms had been implemented and that they were putting together a working party to address the minister’s concerns, which any reasonable organisation would do once requested by the minister. Before they had even started that process the financial rug was pulled out from under the organisation—no excuse, no reason given, no explanation to the board and no explanation to the students as to why ANAM were not given the opportunity to address these matters by the working party, having been requested by the minister to do so. It was not sent down by carrier pigeon, landing six months after the event but by a letter to the board requesting that they do something about it—
Senator Coonan
—It must have been by broadband!
Senator RONALDSON
—that is right—and the board offering to do so and to work with the department. This is a political sham, an academic sham and it is a professional music sham. We should be serious about encouraging the very best in this country. And, as Senator Milne said, it does not matter whether they come from Victoria, Tasmania or Sydney, we do not care. We have a fine institution that was training the very best in this country. This notion from the minister that elite classical musicians must be trained at degree level is a bit like telling an Olympian that they have to go back and do a physical education course. That is absolute, patent nonsense. A lot of these young people have already done degrees. This is about finishing off their expertise and enabling them to make their mark in the world. And have no fear: this is about world-trained young men and women. We should proudly go out and laud the great musicians of this country, the same as we laud our Olympians. Senator Milne and I want to know what the answers are to the questions that have yet remain unanswered and, on behalf of the young people in the gallery, we will insist on it.
Question agreed to.