

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Taxation
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
22-09-2008
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
- Page
5207
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Fifield, Sen Mitchell
- Responder
Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Speaker
- Stage
Taxation
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2008-09-22/0037
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- GOVERNOR-GENERAL’S SPEECH
- BUSINESS
- URGENT RELIEF FOR SINGLE AGE PENSIONERS BILL 2008
- LIBERAL PARTY OF AUSTRALIA
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Economy
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Prime Minister
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Evans, Sen Chris (Leader of the Government in the Senate)) -
Economy
(Wortley, Sen Dana, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Taxation
(Fifield, Sen Mitchell, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Emissions Trading Scheme
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Workplace Relations: Fair Work Australia
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Coal
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Economy
(Bushby, Sen David, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Workplace Relations
(McEwen, Sen Anne, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Wool Industry
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Sherry, Sen Nick)
-
Economy
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BEIJING PARALYMPIC GAMES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- COMMITTEES
-
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (ANNUAL FEES) AMENDMENT (GREENHOUSE GAS STORAGE) BILL 2008
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (REGISTRATION FEES) AMENDMENT (GREENHOUSE GAS STORAGE) BILL 2008
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (SAFETY LEVIES) AMENDMENT (GREENHOUSE GAS STORAGE) BILL 2008 - URGENT RELIEF FOR SINGLE AGE PENSIONERS BILL 2008
- GOVERNOR-GENERAL’S SPEECH
- URGENT RELIEF FOR SINGLE AGE PENSIONERS BILL 2008
-
TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (LUXURY CAR TAX) BILL 2008
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (LUXURY CAR TAX IMPOSITION—GENERAL) AMENDMENT BILL 2008
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (LUXURY CAR TAX IMPOSITION—CUSTOMS) AMENDMENT BILL 2008
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (LUXURY CAR TAX IMPOSITION—EXCISE) AMENDMENT BILL 2008 - ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 5207
Senator FIFIELD (2:25 PM)
—My question is to the Minister representing the Treasurer, Senator Conroy. How much money did the Australian Taxation Office have to repay to car dealers as a result of the recent KAP Motors Federal Court case? Did the government give any undertakings to the car industry that it would not seek to penalise them as a result of this court case?
Senator CONROY (Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy)
—That is a very specific question, Senator Fifield. I will get a specific answer on that detailed question and get it to you as soon as is practicable.
Senator FIFIELD
—Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. This may assist the minister. Isn’t it a fact that the amount ordered to be repaid—roughly $500 million—is very similar to the $550 million tax imposed by the government on the car industry just 10 weeks after the case was concluded? Will the minister deny that the Treasury advice on increasing the luxury car tax referenced the KAP Motors decision? Isn’t it a fact that the proposed luxury car tax increase is simply a case of payback?
Senator CONROY (Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy)
—Claims that this important budget measure is linked to the government closing off a loophole in the GST law are incorrect and misleading. The government is fixing a loophole in the law that allows businesses to get GST refunds they do not deserve. This loophole was revealed by the Federal Court decision in KAP Motors that allowed motor dealers to have a GST refund without passing it on to consumers. To avoid disadvantaging these taxpayers, who the court decided were entitled to a refund, we changed it to ‘going forwards’. As the opposition should know, all GST revenue is paid to the states and territories. Therefore, the Federal Court decision has not had impact on the Commonwealth budget.