

- Title
HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT (REMOVAL OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION WORKPLACE RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS AND NATIONAL GOVERNANCE PROTOCOLS REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS) BILL 2008
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
02-09-2008
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
Milne, Sen Christine
Moore, Claire (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Page
4351
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Carr, Sen Kim
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2008-09-02/0107
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
- NATIONAL GREENHOUSE AND ENERGY REPORTING AMENDMENT BILL 2008
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Environment: Water Management
(Minchin, Sen Nick, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Economy
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Evans, Sen Chris (Leader of the Government in the Senate)) -
Budget Surplus
(Bushby, Sen David, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Climate Change
(Hurley, Sen Annette, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Russia
(Trood, Sen Russell, Faulkner, Sen John)
-
Environment: Water Management
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Russia
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Faulkner, Sen John) -
Ichthys Gas Project
(Johnston, Sen David, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Economy
(Furner, Sen Mark, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Budget
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Economy
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Government Contracts
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Faulkner, Sen John)
-
Russia
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- INDEPENDENT REVIEWER OF TERRORISM LAWS BILL 2008 [NO. 2]
- PRIME MINISTER OF NEW ZEALAND
- PRIVACY AWARENESS WEEK
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- TRADE PRACTICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- COMMITTEES
- NATIONAL GREENHOUSE AND ENERGY REPORTING AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT (REMOVAL OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION WORKPLACE RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS AND NATIONAL GOVERNANCE PROTOCOLS REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS) BILL 2008
- DOCUMENTS
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 4351
Senator CARR (Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research) (6:41 PM)
—Thank you, Senator Mason. Yes, you are quite right: there is a provision under section 54-1 that, if a provider breaches a condition of a grant, the minister may reduce, or require repayment of some of, the grant. It is entirely discretionary. It is a process of negotiation that occurs where there is an allegation of a breach. To my knowledge, it has never been exercised, because these matters are resolved through a negotiation process.
On the other hand, the proposal that you have before the chamber is for a mandatory 7.5 per cent reduction of the university’s base grant. Nothing could be more different in the approach and, of course, that is the point I make to you. There are ample measures of accountability in the legislation, but they are based on discretion and a sensible discussion with people who actually run universities. The assumption that you make is that universities should be treated like some 1950s high school where the minister sits back, sort of like a director general of education, and can manage universities as if they operated something like schools in a previous generation. The directors general of education used to have that sort of power. They do not even have it in schools anymore. That is not how the school system functions anymore, but that is the mentality that the Liberal Party seems to be relying upon.