

- Title
GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
Referral to Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
27-08-2008
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
- Page
3929
- Party
FFP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Fielding, Sen Steve
- Stage
Referral to Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2008-08-27/0151
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
-
- HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT (REMOVAL OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION WORKPLACE RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS AND NATIONAL GOVERNANCE PROTOCOLS REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS) BILL 2008
- SENATORS SWORN
- HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT (REMOVAL OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION WORKPLACE RELATIONS REQUIREMENTS AND NATIONAL GOVERNANCE PROTOCOLS REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS) BILL 2008
- COMMITTEES
- NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (PHARMACEUTICAL AND OTHER BENEFITS—COST RECOVERY) BILL 2008
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- ILLEGAL FISHING
- COMMITTEES
- BASS COAST DESALINATION PLANT
- COMMITTEES
- MURRAY-DARLING RIVER SYSTEM
- SAS SIGNALLER SEAN MCCARTHY
- GUNNS PULP MILL
- MV TAMPA: SEVENTH ANNIVERSARY
- NATIONAL HEARING AWARENESS WEEK
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- COMMITTEES
-
EXCISE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CONDENSATE) BILL 2008
EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT (CONDENSATE) BILL 2008 - TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (MEDICARE LEVY SURCHARGE THRESHOLDS) BILL 2008
-
NATIONAL FUELWATCH (EMPOWERING CONSUMERS) BILL 2008
NATIONAL FUELWATCH (EMPOWERING CONSUMERS) (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2008 - MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
-
GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
THERAPEUTIC GOODS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (ANNUAL CHARGES) BILL 2008
FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008 - GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Nuclear Weapons
(Milne, Sen Christine, Faulkner, Sen John) -
National Competition Council
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Taxation
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Education, Employment and Workplace Relations: Printer Products
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Treasury: Printer Products
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Innovation, Industry, Science and Research: Printer Products
(Milne, Sen Christine, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Tasmania: Frogs
(Milne, Sen Christine, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Survey of Housing and Income
(Milne, Sen Christine, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Prospective Marriage Visas
(Ellison, Sen Chris, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Nuclear Waste Repository
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Carr, Sen Kim)
-
Nuclear Weapons
Page: 3929
Senator FIELDING (Leader of the Family First Party) (4:31 PM)
—I move:
That the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 be referred to the Environment, Communications and the Arts Committee for inquiry and report by 10 November 2008.
The reason Family First has put forward this motion to refer the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2008 to the Senate Standing Committee on Environment, Communications and the Arts for an inquiry and report is that there is concern about the changes in the definitions and direction of the management of the park and about the definition of the precautionary principle, which basically could end up stopping any recreational fishing in the marine park. Everybody is rightly concerned to make sure that the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is looked after, but we need to make sure that we do not stop recreational fishers from legitimately fishing within those boundaries. There have been serious concerns raised by various groups that warrant and justify the Senate looking into this legislation and those concerns before making a decision. I do not want to pre-empt the outcome of any Senate inquiry, but quite clearly there are concerns from various groups. Given those concerns, I think it makes sense for the Senate to look into this bill because it proposes some significant changes to what is currently in place.
There is no need to rush this bill through. The reporting date of 10 November for the inquiry would allow the government to get the legislation through this year, so we are not wanting to frustrate the government. The reporting date gives plenty of time and scope for various interest groups to have their say and for the Senate to listen to both sides of the arguments and make sure there are no unintended consequences. The Senate is the house of review to look at legislation, so I think an inquiry makes sense. I appeal to all senators, not just to the government of the day, to support this motion. It is for an inquiry into a bill that various community groups have concerns with. I think we need to have an inquiry to hear those concerns, to hear both sides, and then the Senate can look at the committee’s report.