

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
Zimbabwe
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-06-2008
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
42
- Electorate
New South Wales
- Interjector
- Page
3370
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Faulkner, Sen John
- Stage
Zimbabwe
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice: Additional Answers
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2008-06-25/0090
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- Migration Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2008
- BUSINESS
-
FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (2008 BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2008
-
In Committee
- Murray, Andrew (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stephens, Sen Ursula
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stephens, Sen Ursula
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stephens, Sen Ursula
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stephens, Sen Ursula
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Bernardi, Sen Cory
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
-
In Committee
- PASSENGER MOVEMENT CHARGE AMENDMENT BILL 2008
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (BUDGET MEASURES) BILL 2008
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2008 MEASURES NO. 1) BILL 2008
- BUSINESS
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2008 MEASURES NO. 1) BILL 2008
- VALEDICTORY
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Emissions Trading Scheme
(Chapman, Sen Grant, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Climate Change
(Moore, Sen Claire, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Alcopops
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Climate Change
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Sherry, Sen Nick) -
Broadband
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Climate Change
(Nettle, Sen Kerry, Evans, Sen Chris) -
Broadband
(Birmingham, Sen Simon, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Climate Change
(Hogg, Sen John, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Broadband
(Fifield, Sen Mitchell, Conroy, Sen Stephen)
-
Emissions Trading Scheme
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- ELECTION COMMITMENTS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- SAVE OUR SOLAR (SOLAR REBATE PROTECTION) BILL 2008
- COMMITTEES
- DEFENCE PROCUREMENT
- COMMERCIAL READY PROGRAM
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- COMMITTEES
- FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (2008 BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2008
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- VALEDICTORY
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 3370
Senator FAULKNER (Special Minister of State and Cabinet Secretary) (3:02 PM)
—Mr President, I seek leave to incorporate some additional information in relation to a question and a supplementary question from Senator Murray on Zimbabwe asked in question time yesterday.
Leave granted.
The answer read as follows—
Additional response from Senator Faulkner to a question from Senator Andrew Murray on Zimbabwe asked in Senate Question time on 24 June.
Senator Murray asked: Are there any changes to Australian legislation or policy being contemplated by the government to implement ‘responsibility to protect’ measures and principles? If there are not, will the government undertake to have a look at them and report back to the Senate in due course as to whether they do intend to implement changes to Australian legislation or policy?
The responsibility to protect principle is an emerging legal concept focused on a state’s responsibility to protect its citizens from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing or crimes against humanity.
It is at this stage an emerging doctrine, and one that Australia supports, however non-consensual action invoking the responsibility to protect principle requires UN Security Council authorisation.
When the Prime Minister met with UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in New York in March this year he announced a $5 million package of support for conflict prevention, including support for the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect principle.
The Government is considering what further measures it might take to assist in the development and implementation of the doctrine.