

- Title
COMMITTEES
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Reference
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
09-08-2007
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
New South Wales
- Interjector
Marshall, Gavin (The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT, The
- Page
58
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Stage
Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee
- Type
- Context
Committees
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2007-08-09/0091
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- INTERNATIONAL DAY OF THE WORLD'S INDIGENOUS PEOPLE
- IRISH MOTORWAY PROJECT AND THE HILL OF TARA
- SENATOR HEFFERNAN
- COMMITTEES
- LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- INCOME OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
- WALLARAH 2 COAL PROJECT
- COMMITTEES
- MILLENIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
- COMMITTEES
-
NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (NATIONAL HPV VACCINATION PROGRAM REGISTER) BILL 2007
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2007
CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (INSOLVENCY) BILL 2007 - SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (TRUSTEE BOARD AND OTHER MEASURES) (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2007
- TRADE PRACTICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2007
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION AMENDMENT (QUARANTINE INSPECTION AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2007
- THERAPEUTIC GOODS AMENDMENT BILL 2007
- NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (NATIONAL HPV VACCINATION PROGRAM REGISTER) BILL 2007
- INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS (NOTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT) AMENDMENT (COSMETICS) BILL 2007
- INTERNATIONAL TAX AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2007
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2007
- CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (INSOLVENCY) BILL 2007
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Economy
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Interest Rates
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Employment
(Fisher, Mary Jo, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Housing Affordability
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Scullion, Sen Nigel) -
Local Government
(Macdonald, Sen Ian, Johnston, Sen David) -
General Practitioners
(Fielding, Sen Steve, Ellison, Sen Chris)
-
Economy
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- MIGRATION (CLIMATE REFUGEES) AMENDMENT BILL 2007
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Wilderness Society
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Attorney-General’s
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Johnston, Sen David) -
Water
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Wet Tropics World Heritage Area
(Milne, Sen Christine, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Convention on Biological Diversity
(Brown, Sen Bob, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Trade Practices
(Webber, Sen Ruth, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Aged Care
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Ellison, Sen Chris)
-
Wilderness Society
Page: 58
Senator NETTLE (12:54 PM)
—I thank other senators for their contributions to this debate. It is not my intention to have a Senate inquiry into something that is before the courts. A number of people have raised that issue, and I would be very happy to extend the reporting date to ensure that that did not occur. As Senator Ludwig outlined in his contribution, it is difficult to set time lines because there is an election coming. The Labor Party indicated they did not support Senator Stott Despoja’s motion because the time line was too long and indicated they were not going to support my motion because the time line was too short. It is a difficult thing to do. I acknowledge the comments that people have made about the importance and possibility of having a judicial inquiry. I would be quite supportive of a judicial inquiry occurring in relation to this matter. But I think we have the opportunity—
Opposition senators interjecting—
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT
(Senator Marshall)—I am sorry, Senator Nettle, but you have provoked a controversy on my left. I call senators to order.
Senator NETTLE
—As I was saying, I would be quite happy for a judicial inquiry to occur. I said that in my opening remarks in relation to this matter. But we do not have the ability to make a judicial inquiry occur; only the government has the ability to make a judicial inquiry occur. We do have the ability to make a Senate inquiry occur, and that is why I am moving this motion in the Senate. I think we have heard from almost every speaker that there should be an inquiry into this matter. People have slightly different views about when and how that should occur, but we have heard that this is a matter that needs to be further looked into. That is what I am proposing—that we have an inquiry. It would be great if the government proposed a judicial inquiry, but the Prime Minister has made it quite clear that it is not the government’s intention to do that. So this is our opportunity, and that is why I am proceeding with this motion. It has been good to hear everybody’s views on this issue and to hear general support for an inquiry from the majority of speakers. This is the opportunity, and that is why I am making this proposal to the Senate. I hope to see it supported.
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT
—The question is that the amendment moved by Senator Bartlett be agreed to.
Question negatived.
Original question put:
That the motion (Senator Nettle’s) be agreed to.