Save Search
    Prev   Next   Return to results listPrint ListEmail Document Link

Title

WHEAT MARKETING AMENDMENT BILL 2007

In Committee

Database

Senate Hansard

Date

21-06-2007

Source

Senate

Parl No.

41

Electorate

Tasmania

Interjector

 

Page

131

Party

ALP

Presenter

 

Status

Final

Question No.

 

Questioner

 

Responder

 

Speaker

O’Brien, Sen Kerry

Stage

In Committee

Type

 

Context

Miscellaneous

System Id

chamber/hansards/2007-06-21/0228


Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Current HansardDownload Current Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Thursday, 21 June 2007
Page: 131


Senator O’BRIEN (4:39 PM) —I move amendment (2) on sheet 5315:

(2)    Schedule 5, item 43, page 26 (line 16) to page 27 (line 3), omit the item, substitute:

43 Section 14

Repeal the section, substitute:

14 Staff

         (1)    The staff of the Commission are to be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.

         (2)    For the purposes of the Public Service Act 1999:

              (a)    the Chairperson and the staff together constitute a Statutory Agency; and

              (b)    the Chairperson is the Head of that Statutory Agency.

43A Before section 16

Insert:

Division 6—Planning and reporting obligations

This is the Grains Council of Australia amendment. The government, without notice and without any consultation whatsoever, removed the reference to the Grains Council, the requirement to brief the Grains Council and the requirement to report to growers, albeit in an annual report table. If there is a move in this direction, there should be full consultation with the industry about this provision before it is done. There has been no consultation. This is simply another high-handed action by this minister to do something, with no warning, no consultation and, frankly, no justification.

This amendment is a matter of basic openness and transparency to the industry that is being regulated and that pays for the Export Wheat Commission or the Wheat Export Authority. Why shouldn’t they and their peak representative body be guaranteed consultation by the legislation rather than at the whim—perhaps suggested by the minister—of whoever is running the authority or the commission at the time?