

- Title
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (A STRONGER SAFETY NET) BILL 2007
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
19-06-2007
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
New South Wales
- Interjector
Webber, Sen Ruth
- Page
107
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Campbell, Sen George
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2007-06-19/0162
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (A STRONGER SAFETY NET) BILL 2007
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Broadband
(Lundy, Sen Kate, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Broadband
(Nash, Sen Fiona, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Broadband
(Brown, Sen Carol, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Economy
(Watson, Sen John, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Broadband
(Carr, Sen Kim, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Firearms
(Fifield, Sen Mitchell, Johnston, Sen David) -
Superannuation
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Workplace Relations
(Chapman, Sen Grant, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Broadband
(Wong, Sen Penny, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Tasmanian Pulp Mill
(Milne, Sen Christine, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Broadband
(Evans, Sen Chris, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Medical Services for Western Sydney
(Payne, Sen Marise, Brandis, Sen George)
-
Broadband
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- DALAI LAMA
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- HUMAN RIGHTS
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- DEFENCE
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
-
CORPORATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SIMPLER REGULATORY SYSTEM) BILL 2007
CORPORATIONS (FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 2007
CORPORATIONS (REVIEW FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 2007 - BUDGET
- SOCIAL SECURITY AMENDMENT (APPRENTICESHIP WAGE TOP-UP FOR AUSTRALIAN APPRENTICES) BILL 2007
-
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2007-2008
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2007-2008
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2007-2008
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 5) 2006-2007
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 6) 2006-2007 -
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (A STRONGER SAFETY NET) BILL 2007
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Marshall, Sen Gavin
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Marshall, Sen Gavin
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Division
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Speech
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Campbell, Sen George
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Webber, Sen Ruth
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Division
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric (Manager of Government Business in the Senate)
- Division
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Division
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Wong, Sen Penny
- Division
- Procedural Text
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Environment: Endangered Species
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Environment: Endangered Species
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Environment: Endangered Species
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Environment: Endangered Species
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Environment: Endangered Species
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Pandemic Influenza Packs
(Carr, Sen Kim, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Passenger Movement Charge
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Johnston, Sen David) -
Duty Free Cigarette Sticks
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Johnston, Sen David) -
Defence: Travel Entitlements
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Ellison, Sen Chris)
-
Environment: Endangered Species
Page: 107
Senator GEORGE CAMPBELL (8:35 PM)
—What you are saying, Minister, is essentially that if an agreement is found to be unfair the onus will be on the employer to remedy it. We are talking about an 18-year-old. Everybody in this country knows that when young people front up to work for the first time they are given a document and told: ‘Sign on the bottom line and you’ve got a job. If you don’t sign, you haven’t got a job.’ There is no negotiation. Senator Webber in her contribution on the second reading debate went through, chapter and verse, a workplace agreement which was being offered in the mining industry in Western Australia to experienced workers—not to people 18 years of age who have just come out of school to go into the workforce—and they were told: ‘Sign it.’ You cannot even take a copy of it away. You have to sign it on the job: ‘Here it is. During your lunchbreak read it over. Give the copy back and sign it or you haven’t got a job.’ And those people do not have a job.
Senator Webber
—That’s right.
Senator GEORGE CAMPBELL
—In fact, Senator Webber’s contribution has forced the Office of Workplace Services to write to her seeking information so they can go and inquire into the circumstances of that agreement. Minister, don’t you sit there and tell us what ACCI told us at the inquiry: that there is not one instance of these things occurring, that it is all a figment of our imagination, that it is all being generated because the ACTU is running a scare campaign. There are a multitude of these circumstances out there that we all know about where people are being forced into adopting or accepting agreements which they do not want to have a bar of, but they have no choice because it is the only way they can get a job.
I have asked you a simple question which you have not, in the past 25 minutes, even come close to attempting to answer. That is: how does an employee in those circumstances—an 18-year-old coming into the workforce for the first time—actually seek to remedy a deficient agreement in such a way as to get the conditions they are seeking and not the conditions that are being imposed upon them by an employer? I have not heard the answer. If you are not prepared to answer it, just tell me and I can go and do something else.