

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Aged Care
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
01-03-2007
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
Minchin, Sen Nick
- Page
100
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Adams, Sen Judith
- Responder
Santoro, Sen Santo
- Speaker
- Stage
Aged Care
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2007-03-01/0165
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- MARRIAGE (RELATIONSHIPS EQUALITY) AMENDMENT BILL 2007
- ELECTORAL (GREATER FAIRNESS OF ELECTORAL PROCESSES) AMENDMENT BILL 2007
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (REMOVAL OF UNJUST RESTRICTIONS) BILL 2007
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (ACCESS TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MIGRATION DECISIONS) BILL 2007
- NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NATIONAL CURRICULUM
- COMMITTEES
- CUSTOMS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MODERNISING IMPORT CONTROLS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2006 [2007]
- BUDGET
- ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER-TERRORISM FINANCING AMENDMENT BILL 2007
- BROADCASTING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2007
-
AVIATION TRANSPORT SECURITY AMENDMENT (ADDITIONAL SCREENING MEASURES) BILL 2007
CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (TAKEOVERS) BILL 2007
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM AMENDMENT (GREATER SUNRISE) BILL 2007
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT (GREATER SUNRISE) BILL 2007
TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2007 MEASURES
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN TECHNICAL COLLEGES (FLEXIBILITY IN ACHIEVING AUSTRALIA’S SKILLS NEEDS) AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2006
- CLASSIFICATION (PUBLICATIONS, FILMS AND COMPUTER GAMES) AMENDMENT BILL 2006
- BANKRUPTCY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SUPERANNUATION CONTRIBUTIONS) BILL 2006 [2007]
- BROADCASTING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2007
- VETERANS’ AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (STATEMENTS OF PRINCIPLES AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2006
- MARITIME LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS) BILL 2006
- FAMILY LAW (DIVORCE FEES VALIDATION) BILL 2007
- NON-PROLIFERATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2006 [2007]
- ACIS ADMINISTRATION AMENDMENT (UNEARNED CREDIT LIABILITY) BILL 2007
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Howard Government: Economic Management
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Howard Government: Economic Management
(Macdonald, Sen Sandy, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Defence Procurement
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Small Business
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Defence: Guided Missile Frigates
(Faulkner, Sen John, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Transport: Infrastructure
(Payne, Sen Marise, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Qantas
(Fielding, Sen Steve, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Taxation
(Fierravanti-Wells, Sen Concetta, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Defence
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Health: Breast Cancer
(Brown, Sen Bob, Santoro, Sen Santo) -
Telstra
(Brown, Sen Carol, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Australian Youth
(Joyce, Sen Barnaby, Scullion, Sen Nigel) -
Defence: Royal Australian Navy
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Aged Care
(Adams, Sen Judith, Santoro, Sen Santo)
-
Howard Government: Economic Management
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- ENVIRONMENT GROUPS: DEDUCTIBLE STATUS TASMANIAN PULP MILL
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
-
MIGRATION AMENDMENT (MARITIME CREW) BILL 2007
CUSTOMS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (AUGMENTING OFFSHORE POWERS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2006 - NUCLEAR POWER
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP BILL 2006
- COMMITTEES
- CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (TAKEOVERS) BILL 2007
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 100
Senator ADAMS (2:56 PM)
—My question is to the Minister for Ageing, Senator Santoro. Will the minister outline to the Senate how the Howard government has been able to increase the safety and security of older Australians in aged care?
Senator SANTORO (Minister for Ageing)
—I thank Senator Adams for her question and again acknowledge her very strong interest in matters relating to ageing Australians and particularly the physical health and welfare of ageing Australians within our aged-care homes. There is no doubt that with Australia’s rapidly ageing population the aged-care industry will continue to require greater financial support from the Commonwealth. It is worth noting that since this government took office in 1996 expenditure on ageing and aged-care activities has increased from $3.1 billion to an estimated $9.9 billion in 2010-11, an increase of 219 per cent. Since 1996 the total number of aged-care places has grown from 141,293 under Labor to 236,000 today. We are pleased that through this government’s disciplined economic management we have been able to deliver $1.5 billion, securing the future of aged care in Australia that I have been talking about in this place all week.
In relation to the package, we have welcomed the endorsement by many of the participants within the aged-care industry of Australia. We have also welcomed the endorsement of the government’s strong economic management by respected aged-care industry figures such as Francis Sullivan from Catholic health services. In relation to this package Mr Sullivan said—and it is worth noting in this place:
It is pleasing to see that frail elderly people can also benefit from the country’s surplus and join in the proceeds of prosperity.
That is what Mr Sullivan said. Just because you are getting on in years and just because you are an elderly person in an aged-care facility it does not mean that you are less deserving to share in the nation’s prosperity that you as an ageing person have contributed so much towards.
From today, as part of the government’s $100 million security reform package, all new aged-care workers and volunteers will be required to undergo police checks to ascertain their suitability to work with frail elderly Australians. With the implementation of this requirement for police checks, the Howard government is again delivering on its commitment to ensure the safety and security of our older citizens who rely on the aged-care sector. We have already delivered on our promise of one unannounced spot check for each aged-care home every year. We have already delivered on that vital promise. The fact that the government is able to fund such measures in an effort to ensure safety and security of aged-care residents as well as ensuring community confidence in the aged-care industry is another indication of what strong economic management can deliver. It shows that this government does not simply regulate and leave someone else with the economic burden, as the previous Labor administration did when they were in government—$100 million plus in debts that we had to fix up.
On this side of the House we recognise the imposition that new safety requirements have on the aged-care sector. Our strong fiscal position means that we have the capacity to assist. They can bleat all they want, but this contrasts with the inheritance this government had from the previous regime, whose fiscal and economic recklessness led the wolf to the doors of Australia’s aged. Embarrassed you may look and embarrassed you may be. Labor’s disastrous mismanagement of the Australian economy and, as a result, the aged-care system was exposed by the Auditor-General in his 1998 report, which revealed that Labor left a shortage of 10,000 beds when they went out of office. It is a stark reminder of how important good fiscal policy is and what a disastrous effect a Labor government would have on the sustainability of the aged-care industry. (Time expired)
Senator Minchin
—Mr President, I ask that further questions be placed on the Notice Paper.