

- Title
PETROLEUM RETAIL LEGISLATION REPEAL BILL 2006
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
12-09-2006
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
- Page
76
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
BILLS
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2006-09-12/0103
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- COMMITTEES
-
PETROLEUM RETAIL LEGISLATION REPEAL BILL 2006
-
In Committee
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Joyce, Sen Barnaby
-
In Committee
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Medibank Private
(Evans, Sen Chris, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Digital Television
(Parry, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Housing Affordability
(Carr, Sen Kim, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Skilled Migration
(Johnston, Sen David, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Housing Affordability
(Webber, Sen Ruth, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Children in Sport
(Bernardi, Sen Cory, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Nuclear Energy
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Illegal Fishing
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Workplace Relations
(Wong, Sen Penny, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Marine Environment
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Horticultural Code of Conduct
(Polley, Sen Helen, Abetz, Sen Eric)
-
Medibank Private
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- OIL DEPLETION PROTOCOL
- DEATH PENALTY
- DETENTION OF PALESTINIAN PARLIAMENTARIANS
- IRAQ
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- CIVIL AVIATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MUTUAL RECOGNITION WITH NEW ZEALAND) BILL 2005 [2006]
- COMMITTEES
- PETROLEUM RETAIL LEGISLATION REPEAL BILL 2006
- DOCUMENTS
-
ADJOURNMENT
- United Nations Population Fund
-
Mr Robert Kelvin MacDonald
Learn @ Work Day - Sir Robert Sparkes
- Australian Defence Force
- Mr Colin Thiele
- Parliament and Civics Education Rebate
- Queensland State Election
- Burrup Peninsula Rock Art
- The Great Gynae Day Out
- Reserve Bank of Australia: Annual Report
- Government Appointments to Public Boards
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Minister for Environment and Heritage: Overseas Travel
(Evans, Sen Chris, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Monetary Compensation
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Australian Technical Colleges
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Oz Trikes (Australia) Pty Ltd
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
AusLink National Network
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Transport and Regional Services: Transcription Services
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Malu Sara
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Minister for Environment and Heritage: Overseas Travel
Page: 76
Senator O’BRIEN (5:59 PM)
—I cannot let Senator Joyce misrepresent reality, let alone our position, in relation to his amendment. I really think that Senator Joyce should sit down and read the proposition that he has put before the chamber and attempt to understand it:
… not less than 25 per cent of the volumetric supply of petroleum products in the market—
which I take it means the whole national market—
within each calendar month is available only to prescribed independent fuel retailers.
Is there a crystal ball to tell the suppliers that this is the cap and that they can supply no more to the so-called non-independents? Or do we take the liberty of saying that, if the major companies lease their stations and enter into a contract to supply their oil to an independent operator, they are then an independent? This has so many holes in it that it makes swiss cheese look like a very solid object. It is, as I said before, a prescription which is probably incapable of enforcement. I do not know what the enforcement is intended to be, looking at the amendment, but I just cannot see how this can be enforced. I say again: if Senator Joyce wants us to seriously consider this proposition, he is going to have to do more work on it rather than putting up the sort of proposition that he has put up. Frankly, the corporate world, if they wanted to, living under this proposition, could shoot holes in it.
Senator Joyce is apparently making an honest effort to do something, but he should not castigate people for not being prepared to vote for something which is demonstrably unenforceable, which demonstrably cannot lead to the outcome that he is talking about and which demonstrably, if it were interpreted as strictly as he would like us to believe it could be interpreted, would lead to some petrol stations and possibly some towns being denied fuel. It would lead to shortages in the country. As I said earlier, it would be like the Soviet command economy in some parts of the country, where the supply of fuel, depending on the predictions that the suppliers made, would be cut off because there would be a fear that they would exceed the 75 per cent limit on those companies set out in subclauses (4) and (5) of the proposed clause.
We notice sometimes that these statements are made when we are on broadcast, and if Senator Joyce needs to make those statements while we are on broadcast so be it, but please do not misrepresent our position and make things up to make your argument. If you have some facts we are happy to hear them, but I have not heard many so far.